Literature DB >> 17106874

Regulation of implant surface cell adhesion: characterization and quantification of S-phase primary osteoblast adhesions on biomimetic nanoscale substrates.

Manus J P Biggs1, R G Richards, N Gadegaard, C D W Wilkinson, M J Dalby.   

Abstract

Integration of an orthopedic prosthesis for bone repair must be associated with osseointegration and implant fixation, an ideal that can be approached via topographical modification of the implant/bone interface. It is thought that osteoblasts use cellular extensions to gather spatial information of the topographical surroundings prior to adhesion formation and cellular flattening. Focal adhesions (FAs) are dynamic structures associated with the actin cytoskeleton that form adhesion plaques of clustered integrin receptors that function in coupling the cell cytoskeleton to the extracellular matrix (ECM). FAs contain structural and signalling molecules crucial to cell adhesion and survival. To investigate the effects of ordered nanotopographies on osteoblast adhesion formation, primary human osteoblasts (HOBs) were cultured on experimental substrates possessing a defined array of nanoscale pits. Nickel shims of controlled nanopit dimension and configuration were fabricated by electron beam lithography and transferred to polycarbonate (PC) discs via injection molding. Nanopits measuring 120 nm diameter and 100 nm in depth with 300 nm center-center spacing were fabricated in three unique geometric conformations: square, hexagonal, and near-square (300 nm spaced pits in square pattern, but with +/-50 nm disorder). Immunofluorescent labeling of vinculin allowed HOB adhesion complexes to be visualized and quantified by image software. Perhipheral adhesions as well as those within the perinuclear region were observed, and adhesion length and number were seen to vary on nanopit substrates relative to smooth PC. S-phase cells on experimental substrates were identified with bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) immunofluorescent detection, allowing adhesion quantification to be conducted on a uniform flattened population of cells within the S-phase of the cell cycle. Findings of this study demonstrate the disruptive effects of ordered nanopits on adhesion formation and the role the conformation of nanofeatures plays in modulating these effects. Highly ordered arrays of nanopits resulted in decreased adhesion formation and a reduction in adhesion length, while introducing a degree of controlled disorder present in near-square arrays, was shown to increase focal adhesion formation and size. HOBs were also shown to be affected morphologicaly by the presence and conformation of nanopits. Ordered arrays affected cellular spreading, and induced an elongated cellular phenotype, indicative of increased motility, while near-square nanopit symmetries induced HOB spreading. It is postulated that nanopits affect osteoblast-substrate adhesion by directly or indirectly affecting adhesion complex formation, a phenomenon dependent on nanopit dimension and conformation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17106874     DOI: 10.1002/jor.20319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  17 in total

1.  A novel culture platform for fast proliferation of human annulus fibrosus cells.

Authors:  Li Xiao; Mengmeng Ding; Osama Saadoon; Eric Vess; Andrew Fernandez; Ping Zhao; Li Jin; Xudong Li
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 5.249

Review 2.  Surface modification of biomaterials and biomedical devices using additive manufacturing.

Authors:  Susmita Bose; Samuel Ford Robertson; Amit Bandyopadhyay
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 3.  Nanotopographical modification: a regulator of cellular function through focal adhesions.

Authors:  Manus Jonathan Paul Biggs; R Geoff Richards; Matthew J Dalby
Journal:  Nanomedicine       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 5.307

4.  Adhesion formation of primary human osteoblasts and the functional response of mesenchymal stem cells to 330nm deep microgrooves.

Authors:  M J P Biggs; R G Richards; S McFarlane; C D W Wilkinson; R O C Oreffo; M J Dalby
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-10-06       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Morphological and Molecular Analysis of Osteoblasts Differentiated from Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Polycaprolactone/Magnesium Oxide/Graphene Oxide Scaffold.

Authors:  Z Niknam; H Zali; V Mansouri; M Rezaei Tavirani; M Omidi
Journal:  Int J Organ Transplant Med       Date:  2019

6.  Biocompatibility and favorable response of mesenchymal stem cells on fibronectin-gold nanocomposites.

Authors:  Huey-Shan Hung; Cheng-Ming Tang; Chien-Hsun Lin; Shinn-Zong Lin; Mei-Yun Chu; Wei-Shen Sun; Wei-Chien Kao; Hsieh Hsien-Hsu; Chih-Yang Huang; Shan-hui Hsu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Protein Expression of STRO-1 Cells in Response to Different Topographic Features.

Authors:  Fahsai Kantawong; Mary E Robertson; Nikolaj Gadegaard; Richard O C Oreffo; Richard J Burchmore; Matthew J Dalby
Journal:  J Tissue Eng       Date:  2011-07-03       Impact factor: 7.813

8.  Nanotopographical control of stem cell differentiation.

Authors:  Laura E McNamara; Rebecca J McMurray; Manus J P Biggs; Fahsai Kantawong; Richard O C Oreffo; Matthew J Dalby
Journal:  J Tissue Eng       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 7.813

Review 9.  Cellular response to low adhesion nanotopographies.

Authors:  Matthew J Dalby
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2007

10.  Proteomic analysis of human osteoprogenitor response to disordered nanotopography.

Authors:  Fahsai Kantawong; Richard Burchmore; Nikolaj Gadegaard; Richard O C Oreffo; Matthew J Dalby
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-12-09       Impact factor: 4.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.