Literature DB >> 17106816

A preliminary study of the draining lymph node basin in advanced lower rectal cancer using a radioactive tracer.

Kimihiko Funahashi1, Junichi Koike, Morio Shimada, Kosuke Okamoto, Tomohiko Goto, Tatsuo Teramoto.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was designed to examine the draining lymph node basin at highest risk of metastasis in lower rectal cancer using 99 mTc-tin colloid.
METHODS: In 43 patients, the area with highest hot nodes density was defined as the draining lymph node basin using a gamma probe. Metastatic states of all removed lymph nodes were examined histologically.
RESULTS: A total of 203 hot nodes were identified in 39 patients (91 percent) with a mean of 5.2 nodes. The number of removed lymph nodes was 808 nodes: 670 nodes in the mesorectum, and 138 nodes in the pelvis. In 21 patients, the metastatic states of 119 nodes were investigated histologically. From the distribution of the identified hot nodes, the draining lymph node basins were classified into two patterns: lateral type (n = 17), and mesorectal type (n = 22). Only 20 (17 percent) of 119 positive nodes were identified as hot node. Tumor cells that occupied the lymph node diffusely or massively probably interfered with the exact diagnosis of metastasis. Lymph node metastasis in the pelvis was observed in 5 patients (13 percent). One false negative was of the mesorectal type with diffuse metastases in the para-aortic lymph nodes. The remaining four patients were of the lateral type and all positive lymph nodes, including positive nonhot nodes, were located within the draining lymph node basin. Consequently, in 20 (95.2 percent) of 21 patients with lymph node metastasis, all positive lymph nodes were located within the draining lymph node basin of the tumor.
CONCLUSIONS: Two types of the draining lymph node basin of advanced lower rectal cancer were identified using this method. The concordance between lymph node metastases and the draining lymph node basin is good.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17106816     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-006-0659-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  6 in total

Review 1.  The role of lateral lymph node dissection in the management of lower rectal cancer.

Authors:  Ziting Wang; Kep Yong Loh; Kok-Yang Tan; Emile Chung-Hou Woo
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  The number of lymph nodes is correlated with mesorectal morphometry.

Authors:  N Pirro; C Pignodel; P Cathala; P Fabbro-Peray; G Godlewski; M Prudhomme
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Endoscopic posterior mesorectal resection as an option to combine local treatment of early stage rectal cancer with partial mesorectal lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  Jörg Köninger; Beat P Müller-Stich; Frank Autschbach; Peter Kienle; Jürgen Weitz; Markus W Büchler; Carsten N Gutt
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Total number of lymph node metastases is a more significant risk factor for poor prognosis than positive lateral lymph node metastasis.

Authors:  Yoichiro Homma; Takashi Hamano; Yoshiro Otsuki; Shinichi Shimizu; Yasuyuki Kobayashi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 5.  Prevalence of Metastatic Lateral Lymph Nodes in Asian Patients with Lateral Lymph Node Dissection for Rectal Cancer: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Niki Christou; Jeremy Meyer; Christophe Combescure; Alexandre Balaphas; Joan Robert-Yap; Nicolas C Buchs; Frédéric Ris
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Does lateral lymph node dissection for low rectal cancer improve overall survival? Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jeremy Meyer; Niki Christou; Christophe Combescure; Nicolas Buchs; Frédéric Ris
Journal:  Int J Surg Protoc       Date:  2019-09-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.