Literature DB >> 1710655

Randomized study of cisplatin dose intensity in poor-risk germ cell tumors: a Southeastern Cancer Study Group and Southwest Oncology Group protocol.

C R Nichols1, S D Williams, P J Loehrer, F A Greco, E D Crawford, J Weetlaufer, M E Miller, A Bartolucci, L Schacter, L H Einhorn.   

Abstract

Between 1984 and 1989, 159 patients presenting with advanced germ cell cancer were entered on a randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy and toxicity of etoposide and bleomycin and either standard-dose cisplatin (20 mg/m2 daily for 5 days) or high-dose cisplatin (40 mg/m2 daily for 5 days). Of the 159 patients, 153 were assessable for toxicity and response. As expected, patients receiving the high-dose cisplatin regimen experienced significantly more neurotoxicity, ototoxicity, nausea and vomiting, and myelo-suppression. Four patients (3%) died related to therapy. Despite the toxicity encountered, dose intensity was maintained. Overall, 84% of patients in the high-dose arm received 80% or more of the projected dose of cisplatin, etoposide, and bleomycin; and 90% of patients on the standard-dose arm received 80% or more of the projected dose. Of the 76 eligible patients randomized to receive the high-dose cisplatin regimen, 52 (68%) became disease-free with chemotherapy alone or with subsequent resection of residual teratoma or cancer. Of the 77 patients randomized to the standard-dose arm, 56 (73%) became disease-free with chemotherapy alone or with surgery. Median follow-up is now 24 months. Eleven patients (three high-dose and eight standard-dose) relapsed from disease-free status. Overall, 74% of patients receiving the high-dose cisplatin regimen are alive, and 63% are continuously free of disease. Of the patients receiving the standard-dose cisplatin regimen, 74% are alive, and 61% are continuously free of disease. This randomized prospective trial in advanced germ cell cancer achieved dose intensity of the most active single agent in this disease. This dose intensity did not translate into an improved survival or cure. We conclude that dose escalation of cisplatin beyond standard doses results in excess toxicity with no accompanying therapeutic benefit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1710655     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1991.9.7.1163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  35 in total

Review 1.  Comparative tolerability of chemotherapy regimens for germ cell cancer.

Authors:  S Culine; J P Droz
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 2.  Advances in the treatment of testicular cancer.

Authors:  Hans-Georg Kopp; Markus Kuczyk; Johannes Classen; Arnulf Stenzl; Lothar Kanz; Frank Mayer; Michael Bamberg; Jörg Thomas Hartmann
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Testicular cancer and related neoplasms.

Authors:  G M Mead
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-05-30

Review 4.  Biological predictors of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN): MASCC neurological complications working group overview.

Authors:  Alexandre Chan; Daniel L Hertz; Manuel Morales; Elizabeth J Adams; Sharon Gordon; Chia Jie Tan; Nathan P Staff; Jayesh Kamath; Jeong Oh; Shivani Shinde; Doreen Pon; Niharkia Dixit; James D'Olimpio; Cristina Dumitrescu; Margherita Gobbo; Kord Kober; Samantha Mayo; Linda Pang; Ishwaria Subbiah; Andreas S Beutler; Katherine B Peters; Charles Loprinzi; Maryam B Lustberg
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 5.  High-dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation for advanced testicular cancer.

Authors:  Martin H Voss; Darren R Feldman; Robert J Motzer
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.512

Review 6.  Treatment intensification in disseminated germ-cell tumors.

Authors:  J Beyer; C Bokemeyer; H J Schmoll; W Siegert
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Management of residual mass in nonseminomatous germ cell tumors following chemotherapy.

Authors:  Siamak Daneshmand; Hooman Djaladat; Craig Nichols
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2011-08

8.  Personalised chemotherapy based on tumour marker decline in poor prognosis germ-cell tumours (GETUG 13): a phase 3, multicentre, randomised trial.

Authors:  Karim Fizazi; Lance Pagliaro; Agnes Laplanche; Aude Fléchon; Josef Mardiak; Lionnel Geoffrois; Pierre Kerbrat; Christine Chevreau; Remy Delva; Frederic Rolland; Christine Theodore; Guilhem Roubaud; Gwenaëlle Gravis; Jean-Christophe Eymard; Jean-Pierre Malhaire; Claude Linassier; Muriel Habibian; Anne-Laure Martin; Florence Journeau; Maria Reckova; Christopher Logothetis; Stephane Culine
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 41.316

9.  Calculation of received dose intensity for combinations of drugs using small-cell lung carcinoma treatment regimens as examples.

Authors:  G L Wampler; J G Fryer
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.333

10.  Alternating dose-dense chemotherapy in patients with high volume disseminated non-seminomatous germ cell tumours.

Authors:  K Fizazi; D M Prow; K-A Do; X Wang; L Finn; J Kim; D Daliani; C N Papandreou; S-M Tu; R E Millikan; L C Pagliaro; C J Logothetis; R J Amato
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-05-20       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.