Literature DB >> 17106104

Survey of management practices on reproductive performance of dairy cattle on large US commercial farms.

D Z Caraviello1, K A Weigel, P M Fricke, M C Wiltbank, M J Florent, N B Cook, K V Nordlund, N R Zwald, C L Rawson.   

Abstract

A survey regarding general management, sire selection, reproductive management, inseminator training and technique, heat abatement, body condition scoring, facility design and grouping, nutrition, employee training and management, and animal health and bio-security was carried out from March to September of 2004 in 153 herds in the Alta Genetics (Watertown, WI) Advantage Progeny Testing Program. A total of 103 herds (67.3%) completed the survey. Herd size was 613 +/- 46 cows, with herds located in Wisconsin (26), California (12), New York (11), Minnesota (10), Michigan (7), Washington (6), Pennsylvania (6), Iowa (5), Idaho (5), Texas (4), Ohio (4), and other states (7). These farms sold 34.5 +/- 0.3 kg of milk/d per cow, with an annual culling rate of 34 +/- 1% and a calving interval of 13.8 +/- 0.1 mo. Cows were observed for estrus 2.8 +/- 0.3 times/d, for a duration of 27 +/- 4 min, but 78% of the respondents admitted that detection of estrus was not the employee's sole responsibility at that time. Managers tried to achieve pregnancy until 8.8 +/- 0.9 failed inseminations, 300 +/- 26 d postpartum, or milk yield <17.7 +/- 0.5 kg/d. Nonpregnant cows were culled at 326 +/- 36 d postpartum or milk yield <16.4 +/- 0.3 kg/ d. Mean durations of the voluntary waiting period were 52 +/- 1.3 and 53 +/- 1.4 d for primiparous and multiparous cows, respectively. Hormonal synchronization or timed artificial insemination programs were used in 87% of the herds, with 86% synchronizing first services, 77% resynchronizing repeat services, and 59% treating cystic, anestrous, or anovular cows. Finding good employees was identified as the greatest labor challenge, followed by training and supervising employees. Mastitis and hairy heel warts were noted as the greatest animal health concerns, followed by lameness, abortions, and death losses, whereas the greatest reproductive challenges were artificial insemination service rate, conception rate, twinning, and retained placenta or metritis. Results of this study can provide a useful benchmark or reference with regard to commonly used management practices on large commercial US dairy farms at the present time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17106104     DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72522-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  9 in total

1.  Estimation of genetic parameters for 13 female fertility indices in Holstein dairy cows.

Authors:  Shahin Eghbalsaied
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Key Performance Indicators Used by Dairy Consultants During the Evaluation of Reproductive Performance in a First Visit.

Authors:  Ramon Armengol; Lorenzo Fraile; Alex Bach
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-06-23

3.  Standard feeding strategies with natural insemination improved fertility in repeat breeding dairy cows.

Authors:  Mir Md Iqbal Hasan; Moinul Hasan; Mohammad Harun-Or-Rashid; Marzia Rahman; Md Siddiqur Rahman; Nasrin Sultana Juyena
Journal:  J Adv Vet Anim Res       Date:  2021-06-23

4.  A survey of drying-off practices on commercial dairy farms in northern Germany and a comparison to science-based recommendations.

Authors:  Sandra Bertulat; Carola Fischer-Tenhagen; Wolfgang Heuwieser
Journal:  Vet Rec Open       Date:  2015-02-20

5.  Use of Stochastic Simulation to Evaluate the Reduction in Methane Emissions and Improvement in Reproductive Efficiency from Routine Hormonal Interventions in Dairy Herds.

Authors:  Simon C Archer; Christopher D Hudson; Martin J Green
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Challenges to increase the AI and ET markets in Brazil.

Authors:  Pietro Sampaio Baruselli; Bruna Lima Chechin Catussi; Laís Ângelo de Abreu; Flavia Morag Elliff; Laísa Garcia da Silva; Emiliana de Oliveira Santana Batista
Journal:  Anim Reprod       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 1.807

7.  Evaluation of seasonal patterns and herd-level traits associated with insemination risk in large dairy herds in Kansas.

Authors:  Alexandre L A Scanavez; Andréia G Arruda; Jeffrey S Stevenson; Luís G D Mendonça
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The Management of Cow Shelters (Gaushalas) in India, Including the Attitudes of Shelter Managers to Cow Welfare.

Authors:  Arvind Sharma; Catherine Schuetze; Clive J C Phillips
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 9.  Nanotechnology and Reproductive Management of Farm Animals: Challenges and Advances.

Authors:  Nesrein M Hashem; Antonio Gonzalez-Bulnes
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 2.752

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.