Literature DB >> 17103207

Imagery of different sensory modalities: hypnotizability and body sway.

G Carli1, F I Cavallaro, C A Rendo, Enrica L Santarcangelo.   

Abstract

Postural control in subjects with high (Highs) and low (Lows) susceptibility to hypnosis is differentially affected by changes in visual and neck tactile/proprioceptive input. The aim of the present experiment was to investigate whether imagery of the visual and tactile sensory modalities also induces different modulation of postural control in Highs and Lows. Fourteen Highs and 16 Lows were included in the study; they were recorded while standing upright with eyes closed during visual and tactile imagery tasks and during mental computation. Their posture and movement were recorded with an Elite System and their experience was assessed after each task in a structured interview. Visual imagery was judged "easier" than tactile imagery by Lows, while Highs performed both tasks easily and judged the tactile imagery less effortful and more vivid than Lows. No difference was observed for the mental computation. The Highs' body sway was not affected by the cognitive tasks, while Lows showed a task-related modulation of body sway. The results are in line with the hypothesis of lower vulnerability of Highs to the effects of tasks interfering with postural control and of different sensory-motor integration in Highs and Lows.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17103207     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0776-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   2.064


  37 in total

1.  Effects of spatial and nonspatial cognitive activity on postural stability.

Authors:  Elizabeth A. Maylor; Sue Allison; Alan M. Wing
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2001-05

2.  Mood states and anxiety influence abilities to maintain balance control in healthy human subjects.

Authors:  Benoît Bolmont; Pierre Gangloff; Alexandre Vouriot; Philippe P Perrin
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2002-08-23       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Does hypnotizability affect human upright stance?

Authors:  E L Santarcangelo; C Rendo; J Carpaneto; P Dario; S Micera; G Carli
Journal:  Arch Ital Biol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Selective utilization of spatial working memory resources during stance posture.

Authors:  Timothy J VanderVelde; Marjorie H Woollacott; Anne Shumway-Cook
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 1.837

5.  Modulation of pain-induced endothelial dysfunction by hypnotisability.

Authors:  Zoltan Jambrik; Enrica L Santarcangelo; Tibor Rudisch; Albert Varga; Tamas Forster; Giancarlo Carli
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 6.961

6.  Interaction between attention demanding motor and cognitive tasks and static postural stability.

Authors:  D L Weeks; R Forget; L Mouchnino; D Gravel; D Bourbonnais
Journal:  Gerontology       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.140

Review 7.  Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition.

Authors:  M Jeannerod
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Anxiety affects the postural sway of the antero-posterior axis in college students.

Authors:  M Wada; N Sunaga; M Nagai
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2001-04-20       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  Attentional demands for postural control: the effects of aging and sensory reintegration.

Authors:  N Teasdale; M Simoneau
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.840

Review 10.  The relationship between visual perception and visual mental imagery: a reappraisal of the neuropsychological evidence.

Authors:  Paolo Bartolomeo
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.027

View more
  6 in total

1.  Hypnotizability-dependent accuracy in the reproduction of haptically explored paths.

Authors:  Manuel Menzocchi; Enrica L Santarcangelo; Giancarlo Carli; Alain Berthoz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Can imagery become reality?

Authors:  E L Santarcangelo; E Scattina; G Carli; B Ghelarducci; P Orsini; D Manzoni
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Modulation of the postural effects of cognitive load by hypnotizability.

Authors:  Enrica Laura Santarcangelo; E Scattina; G Carli; R Balocchi; A Macerata; D Manzoni
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Hypnotizability-dependent modulation of postural control: effects of alteration of the visual and leg proprioceptive inputs.

Authors:  Enrica Laura Santarcangelo; E Scattina; G Carli; A Macerata; D Manzoni
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-16       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Postural effects of imagined leg pain as a function of hypnotizability.

Authors:  Eliana Scattina; Alexa Huber; Manuel Menzocchi; Giulia Paoletti; Giancarlo Carli; Diego Manzoni; Enrica L Santarcangelo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  New views of hypnotizability.

Authors:  Enrica L Santarcangelo
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 3.558

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.