Kevin K W Wang1, Stephen F Larner, Gillian Robinson, Ronald L Hayes. 1. Center for Neuroproteomics and Biomarkers Research, Department of Psychiatry, McKnight Brain Institute of the University of Florida, 100 S. Newell Drive, Box 100256, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA. kwang@psychiatry.ufl.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The scarcity of pharmacological neuroprotective treatments for traumatic brain injury is a concern being targeted on various fronts. This review examines the latest treatments under investigation. RECENT FINDINGS: In the last 12-18 months, no drug has completed phase III clinical trials as a clearly proven method to treat traumatic brain injury. While the drugs work in rodents, when they make it to clinical trial they have failed primarily due to negative side-effects. Those still in trial show promise, and even those rejected have undergone modifications and now show potential, e.g. second-generation N-methyl-D-aspartic acid and alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-methyl-4-isoxazolyl-propionic acid receptor antagonists, calpain inhibitors, and cyclosporine A analogues. Also, several drugs not previously given much attention, such as the antibiotic minocycline, estrogen and progesterone, and a drug already approved for other diseases, erythropoietin, are being examined. Finally, a treatment generating some controversy, but showing potential, is the application of hypothermia to the patients. SUMMARY: Clearly, finding treatments for traumatic brain injury is not going to be easy and is evidently going to require numerous trials. The good news is that we are closer to finding one or more methods for treating traumatic brain injury patients.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The scarcity of pharmacological neuroprotective treatments for traumatic brain injury is a concern being targeted on various fronts. This review examines the latest treatments under investigation. RECENT FINDINGS: In the last 12-18 months, no drug has completed phase III clinical trials as a clearly proven method to treat traumatic brain injury. While the drugs work in rodents, when they make it to clinical trial they have failed primarily due to negative side-effects. Those still in trial show promise, and even those rejected have undergone modifications and now show potential, e.g. second-generation N-methyl-D-aspartic acid and alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-methyl-4-isoxazolyl-propionic acid receptor antagonists, calpain inhibitors, and cyclosporine A analogues. Also, several drugs not previously given much attention, such as the antibiotic minocycline, estrogen and progesterone, and a drug already approved for other diseases, erythropoietin, are being examined. Finally, a treatment generating some controversy, but showing potential, is the application of hypothermia to the patients. SUMMARY: Clearly, finding treatments for traumatic brain injury is not going to be easy and is evidently going to require numerous trials. The good news is that we are closer to finding one or more methods for treating traumatic brain injurypatients.
Authors: Cole Vonder Haar; Gail D Anderson; Brandy E Elmore; Lynn H Moore; Amanda M Wright; Eric D Kantor; Fred M Farin; Theo K Bammler; James W MacDonald; Michael R Hoane Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2014-01-20 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Jordan L Harrison; Rachel K Rowe; Bruce F O'Hara; P David Adelson; Jonathan Lifshitz Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2014-04-24 Impact factor: 1.972
Authors: Pramod K Dash; Michael J Hylin; Kimberly N Hood; Sara A Orsi; Jing Zhao; John B Redell; Andrey S Tsvetkov; Anthony N Moore Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2015-07-20 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Kaori H Yamada; Dorothy A Kozlowski; Stacey E Seidl; Steven Lance; Adam J Wieschhaus; Premanand Sundivakkam; Chinnaswamy Tiruppathi; Imran Chishti; Ira M Herman; Shafi M Kuchay; Athar H Chishti Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2012-02-24 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Zhiqun Zhang; Stefania Mondello; Firas Kobeissy; Richard Rubenstein; Jackson Streeter; Ronald L Hayes; Kevin K W Wang Journal: Transl Stroke Res Date: 2011-12-07 Impact factor: 6.829
Authors: Shankar Sadasivan; Zhiqun Zhang; Stephen F Larner; Ming C Liu; Wenrong Zheng; Firas H Kobeissy; Ronald L Hayes; Kevin K W Wang Journal: BMC Neurosci Date: 2010-02-18 Impact factor: 3.288