Literature DB >> 17102670

Posterior lamellar keratoplasty using descemetorhexis and organ-cultured donor corneal tissue (Melles technique).

Carla P Nieuwendaal1, Ruth Lapid-Gortzak, Ivanka J van der Meulen, Gerrit J R Melles.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report the clinical results of posterior lamellar keratoplasty (PLK) using predissected organ-cultured donor corneal tissue implanted after stripping of the Descemet membrane.
METHODS: Twenty-two eyes of 22 patients in whom a PLK procedure was performed for pseudophakic bullous keratopathy and/or Fuchs endothelial dystrophy were evaluated. In all eyes, the recipient Descemet membrane was excised by performing a descemetorhexis. Just after harvesting the donor tissue, each cornea had a posterior lamellar dissection made at approximately 80% stromal depth, and each cornea was preserved in an organ culture system for 10 to 21 days. During surgery, a posterior lamellar disk was trephinated from the predissected donor cornea and inserted through a 5.0-mm scleral incision into the anterior chamber of the recipient by folding the donor. Specular microscopy was performed at 6, 12, and 18 months to measure the endothelial cell density.
RESULTS: In 3 eyes (14%), the posterior donor disk did not attach to the recipient posterior stroma, so a penetrating keratoplasty was performed in a secondary procedure. The transplants in the remaining 19 eyes cleared and maintained clarity throughout the follow-up period. In these eyes, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ranged from 0.25 to 1.0 up to 27 months of follow-up. Postoperative astigmatism averaged 1.7 +/- 1.0 D. Endothelial cell density averaged 1650 +/- 390 cells/mm at 6 months, 1560 +/- 350 cells/mm at 12 months, and 1500 +/- 430 cells/mm at 24 months. Two eyes developed mild interface haze.
CONCLUSION: PLK can be performed using an organ-cultured donor posterior disk. Visual rehabilitation may be slower than in PLK with fresh donor tissue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17102670     DOI: 10.1097/01.ico.0000239002.92989.1a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Descemet's stripping with automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK)].

Authors:  C Cursiefen; F E Kruse
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Endothelial keratoplasty: clinical outcomes in the two years following deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).

Authors:  Mark A Terry
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2007

3.  Intraocular pressure after descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK).

Authors:  Carla P Nieuwendaal; Ivanka J E van der Meulen; Ruth Lapid-Gortzak; Maarten P Mourits
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Double port injector device to reduce endothelial damage in DMEK.

Authors:  F Arnalich-Montiel; F J Muñoz-Negrete; M P De Miguel
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 5.  [Keratoplasty: laminate or penetrate? Part 2: lamellar keratoplasty].

Authors:  P Maier; T Reinhard
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.059

6.  Prospective evaluation of clinical outcomes between pre-cut corneal grafts prepared using a manual or automated technique: with one-year follow-up.

Authors:  Marc B Muijzer; Chantal M van Luijk; Antoon J van den Bogaerdt; Piet J Kruit; Esther Groeneveld-van Beek; Gerrit R J Melles; Robert P L Wisse
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 3.761

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.