Literature DB >> 17101833

Progression in frontotemporal dementia: identifying a benign behavioral variant by magnetic resonance imaging.

Rhys R Davies1, Christopher M Kipps, Joanna Mitchell, Jillian J Kril, Glenda M Halliday, John R Hodges.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical course and prognosis in patients with behavioral-variant frontotemporal dementia (FTD) lacking evidence of brain atrophy on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
DESIGN: Patients were enrolled into this prospective cohort study over a period of 15 years; cognitive status, duration of symptoms, and behavioral indexes were recorded. Brain MRIs were rated using a standardized scale.
SETTING: Regional early-onset dementia clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-one participants diagnosed clinically with behavioral-variant FTD. Intervention Rating of MRIs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Death or institutionalization after a minimum of 3 years' follow-up indicated poor prognosis, while the ability to live independently was regarded as a good prognosis for the purpose of survival (Kaplan-Meier) and discriminant function analysis.
RESULTS: Patients with normal or borderline MRI findings (n = 15) showed significantly longer survival to institutionalization or death than those (n = 16) with definite frontotemporal atrophy (mean +/- SE, 9.3 +/- 1.7 years vs 3.0 +/- 0.7 years; P<.01). Using groups defined by 3-year outcome (good or bad prognosis), cerebral atrophy predicted poor outcome while age, symptom duration, cognitive performance, behavioral impairment, and overall disability at baseline did not.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with FTD with normal MRI results follow a more benign course than cases with atrophy at presentation. The substrate of the behavioral symptoms in such cases may differ from the neurodegenerative pathological features typically associated with FTD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17101833     DOI: 10.1001/archneur.63.11.1627

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Neurol        ISSN: 0003-9942


  57 in total

1.  Psychiatric conditions that can mimic early behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia: the importance of the new diagnostic criteria.

Authors:  Facundo Manes
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.285

2.  Measuring disease progression in frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a clinical and MRI study.

Authors:  E Gordon; J D Rohrer; L G Kim; R Omar; M N Rossor; N C Fox; J D Warren
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Sensitivity of current criteria for the diagnosis of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia.

Authors:  O Piguet; M Hornberger; B P Shelley; C M Kipps; J R Hodges
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 4.  Distinguishing Alzheimer's disease from other major forms of dementia.

Authors:  Stella Karantzoulis; James E Galvin
Journal:  Expert Rev Neurother       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.618

5.  Visual rating versus volumetry to detect frontotemporal dementia.

Authors:  T W Chow; F Gao; K A Links; J E Ween; D F Tang-Wai; J Ramirez; C J M Scott; M Freedman; D T Stuss; S E Black
Journal:  Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 2.959

6.  How much do physicians in Latin America know about behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia?

Authors:  Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht; Daniel Flichtentrei; Facundo Manes
Journal:  J Mol Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.444

7.  Predicting functional decline in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia.

Authors:  Keith A Josephs; Jennifer L Whitwell; Stephen D Weigand; Matthew L Senjem; Bradley F Boeve; David S Knopman; Glenn E Smith; Robert J Ivnik; Clifford R Jack; Ronald C Petersen
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Evaluation of Ultrafast Wave-CAIPI MPRAGE for Visual Grading and Automated Measurement of Brain Tissue Volume.

Authors:  M G F Longo; J Conklin; S F Cauley; K Setsompop; Q Tian; D Polak; M Polackal; D Splitthoff; W Liu; R G González; P W Schaefer; J E Kirsch; O Rapalino; S Y Huang
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 9.  Clinical diagnostic criteria and classification controversies in frontotemporal lobar degeneration.

Authors:  Katya Rascovsky; Murray Grossman
Journal:  Int Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2013-04

10.  Functional neural network analysis in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease using EEG and graph theory.

Authors:  Willem de Haan; Yolande A L Pijnenburg; Rob L M Strijers; Yolande van der Made; Wiesje M van der Flier; Philip Scheltens; Cornelis J Stam
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 3.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.