Literature DB >> 17100980

Safety and tolerability of transoral Bravo capsule placement after transnasal manometry using a validated conversion factor.

Brian E Lacy1, Tracia O'Shana, Mary Hynes, Maurice L Kelley, Julia E Weiss, Lisa Paquette, Richard I Rothstein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To prospectively calculate and validate a conversion factor in healthy volunteers that allows accurate nonsedated, transoral (TO) Bravo capsule placement after transnasal (TN) manometry, and to evaluate the ease and safety of nonendoscopic Bravo placement compared with endoscopic placement.
METHODS: Part 1. Twenty-five healthy volunteers underwent sequential TN and TO esophageal manometry to measure the distance to the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). A TN to TO conversion factor was calculated from these measurements. Part 2. Twenty volunteers underwent TN manometry followed by unsedated TO Bravo capsule placement using the conversion factor calculated in part 1. TN endoscopy then measured the location of the Bravo capsule in relationship to the squamocolumnar junction (SCJ). Part 3. During an 18-month period, 370 consecutive patients referred for a Bravo procedure underwent nonendoscopic, unsedated TO placement (308 patients) or standard endoscopically assisted placement (62 patients).
RESULTS: Part 1. All 25 volunteers completed TN and TO manometry; a conversion factor of 4 cm was calculated. Part 2. Using the calculated conversion factor of 4 cm, a Bravo capsule was deployed TO 5 cm above the proximal border of the LES. The mean +/- standard deviation (SD) TN endoscopic distance to the capsule was 6.0 cm (+/-0.3 cm) above the SCJ. Part 3. A total of 333 patients completed the entire study (90%). Analysis of 48-h pH measurements did not reveal any significant differences between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: A reliable and valid conversion factor of 4 cm following TN manometry permits accurate TO placement of the Bravo capsule without endoscopy. TO, unsedated Bravo placement is safe, well tolerated, and may minimize costs and potential risks associated with endoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17100980     DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00889.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  7 in total

Review 1.  Esophageal testing: What we have so far.

Authors:  Nicola de Bortoli; Irene Martinucci; Lorenzo Bertani; Salvatore Russo; Riccardo Franchi; Manuele Furnari; Salvatore Tolone; Giorgia Bodini; Valeria Bolognesi; Massimo Bellini; Vincenzo Savarino; Santino Marchi; Edoardo Vincenzo Savarino
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2016-02-15

2.  Ultrahigh speed en face OCT capsule for endoscopic imaging.

Authors:  Kaicheng Liang; Giovanni Traverso; Hsiang-Chieh Lee; Osman Oguz Ahsen; Zhao Wang; Benjamin Potsaid; Michael Giacomelli; Vijaysekhar Jayaraman; Ross Barman; Alex Cable; Hiroshi Mashimo; Robert Langer; James G Fujimoto
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 3.  The role of oesophageal physiological testing in the assessment of noncardiac chest pain.

Authors:  Henriette Heinrich; Rami Sweis
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 5.091

4.  Lymphocytic Esophagitis in Nonachalasia Primary Esophageal Motility Disorders: Improved Criteria, Prevalence, Strength of Association, and Natural History.

Authors:  Juan Putra; Kristen E Muller; Zilla H Hussain; Siddhartha Parker; Scott Gabbard; Elizabeth B Brickley; Brian E Lacy; Richard Rothstein; Mikhail Lisovsky
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 6.394

5.  Unsedated peroral wireless pH capsule placement vs. standard pH testing: a randomized study and cost analysis.

Authors:  Christopher N Andrews; Daniel C Sadowski; Adriana Lazarescu; Chad Williams; Emil Neshev; Martin Storr; Flora Au; Steven J Heitman
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  Comparison of esophageal placement of Bravo capsule system under direct endoscopic guidance with conventional placement method.

Authors:  Aijaz A Sofi; Charles Filipiak; Thomas Sodeman; Usman Ahmad; Ali Nawras; Isam Daboul
Journal:  Clin Exp Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-10-15

7.  Esophageal Acid Clearance During Random Swallowing Is Faster in Patients with Barrett's Esophagus Than in Healthy Controls.

Authors:  Christian Lottrup; Anne L Krarup; Hans Gregersen; Per Ejstrud; Asbjørn M Drewes
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2016-10-30       Impact factor: 4.924

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.