Literature DB >> 17100814

Efficacy, safety and hospital costs of tension-free vaginal tape and pubovaginal sling in the surgical treatment of stress incontinence.

Atsuo Kondo1, Yasuaki Isobe, Kyousuke Kimura, Osamu Kamihira, Osamu Matsuura, Momokazu Gotoh, Hideo Ozawa.   

Abstract

AIM: The efficacy, safety and hospital costs of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure were compared with the pubovaginal sling operation.
METHODS: A total of 60 women urodynamically diagnosed as having stress or mixed urinary incontinence were operated on using either the tension-free vaginal tape or pubovaginal sling operation in a prospective manner. Preoperative characteristics of the women were not significantly different for the groups. The women were followed for up to 24 months.
RESULTS: In the tension-free vaginal tape group, the operation time was shorter, numbers of analgesics postoperatively required were less and hospital charges were less expensive compared to those in the pubovaginal sling operation (P < 0.01). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed a marginal significant difference (P = 0.059) in the objective cumulative cure rates at 24 months between the groups receiving the former (70.3%) and latter (48.3%) procedures. Subjective cure rates were not significantly different (P = 0.101). In both groups, an improvement in quality of life was significant and surgical complications were identical. De novo urge incontinence developed in 6% and 10% in the former and latter, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The tension-free tape was significantly superior to the pubovaginal sling in terms of operation time, postoperative pain, and hospital charges, but not in cure rates. A longer follow up with a larger sample size is necessary to draw definite conclusions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17100814     DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2006.00469.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res        ISSN: 1341-8076            Impact factor:   1.730


  7 in total

1.  Population-based trends in ambulatory surgery for urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Anne M Suskind; Samuel R Kaufman; Rodney L Dunn; John T Stoffel; J Quentin Clemens; Brent K Hollenbeck
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Surgery for stress urinary incontinence in the United States: does race play a role?

Authors:  Aparna D Shah; Neeraj Kohli; Sujatha S Rajan; Lennox Hoyte
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-03-29

Review 3.  Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.

Authors:  Haroon Rehman; Carlos A Bezerra; Homero Bruschini; June D Cody; Patricia Aluko
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-07-26

4.  The distribution of different surgical types for female stress urinary incontinence among patients' age, surgeons' specialties and hospital accreditations in Taiwan: a descriptive 10-year nationwide study.

Authors:  Ming-Ping Wu; Kuan-Hui Huang; Cheng-Yu Long; Kuo-Feng Huang; Ken-Jen Yu; Chao-Hsiun Tang
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-08-12

5.  The age distribution, rates, and types of surgery for stress urinary incontinence in the USA.

Authors:  Aparna D Shah; Neeraj Kohli; Sujatha S Rajan; Lennox Hoyte
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-05-22

6.  Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.

Authors:  Lucky Saraswat; Haroon Rehman; Muhammad Imran Omar; June D Cody; Patricia Aluko; Cathryn Ma Glazener
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-01-28

7.  Heterogeneity of cost estimates in health economic evaluation research. A systematic review of stress urinary incontinence studies.

Authors:  Sandra Zwolsman; Arnoud Kastelein; Joost Daams; Jan-Paul Roovers; B C Opmeer
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 2.894

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.