Literature DB >> 17100784

Dehumanizing the lowest of the low: neuroimaging responses to extreme out-groups.

Lasana T Harris1, Susan T Fiske.   

Abstract

Traditionally, prejudice has been conceptualized as simple animosity. The stereotype content model (SCM) shows that some prejudice is worse. The SCM previously demonstrated separate stereotype dimensions of warmth (low-high) and competence (low-high), identifying four distinct out-group clusters. The SCM predicts that only extreme out-groups, groups that are both stereotypically hostile and stereotypically incompetent (low warmth, low competence), such as addicts and the homeless, will be dehumanized. Prior studies show that the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) is necessary for social cognition. Functional magnetic resonance imaging provided data for examining brain activations in 10 participants viewing 48 photographs of social groups and 12 participants viewing objects; each picture dependably represented one SCM quadrant. Analyses revealed mPFC activation to all social groups except extreme (low-low) out-groups, who especially activated insula and amygdala, a pattern consistent with disgust, the emotion predicted by the SCM. No objects, though rated with the same emotions, activated the mPFC. This neural evidence supports the prediction that extreme out-groups may be perceived as less than human, or dehumanized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17100784     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01793.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  125 in total

Review 1.  Identity economics and the brain: uncovering the mechanisms of social conflict.

Authors:  Scott A Huettel; Rachel E Kranton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  The neuroscience of empathy: progress, pitfalls and promise.

Authors:  Jamil Zaki; Kevin N Ochsner; Kevin Ochsner
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2012-04-15       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Does context matter in evaluations of stigmatized individuals? An fMRI study.

Authors:  Anne C Krendl; Joseph M Moran; Nalini Ambady
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  When minds matter for moral judgment: intent information is neurally encoded for harmful but not impure acts.

Authors:  Alek Chakroff; James Dungan; Jorie Koster-Hale; Amelia Brown; Rebecca Saxe; Liane Young
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Grolar Bears, Social Class, and Policy Relevance: Extraordinary Agendas for the Emerging 21st Century.

Authors:  Susan T Fiske
Journal:  Eur J Soc Psychol       Date:  2015-05-29

6.  Social cognition in members of conflict groups: behavioural and neural responses in Arabs, Israelis and South Americans to each other's misfortunes.

Authors:  Emile G Bruneau; Nicholas Dufour; Rebecca Saxe
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Evaluating Vancouver's supervised injection facility: data and dollars, symbols and ethics.

Authors:  Don C Des Jarlais; Kamyar Arasteh; Holly Hagan
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Social Structure Shapes Cultural Stereotypes and Emotions: A Causal Test of the Stereotype Content Model.

Authors:  Peter A Caprariello; Amy J C Cuddy; Susan T Fiske
Journal:  Group Process Intergroup Relat       Date:  2009-03

9.  Stereotype Content: Warmth and Competence Endure.

Authors:  Susan T Fiske
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-02-28

10.  Intergroup social influence on emotion processing in the brain.

Authors:  Lynda C Lin; Yang Qu; Eva H Telzer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.