Literature DB >> 17100743

Outcome of oral implant treatment in partially edentulous jaws followed 20 years in clinical function.

Ulf Lekholm1, Kerstin Gröndahl, Torsten Jemt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most long-term follow-up studies of implants in partially edentulous jaws present their outcomes as mean values of implant survival and follow-up time, and few address the fate of the remaining teeth.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the results of oral implant treatment in partially edentulous jaws after 20 years, and simultaneously to assess what happens to teeth present at the time of implant placement.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventeen partially edentulous patients, of 27 originally treated individuals, were retrospectively reviewed after receiving implants from 1983 to 1985. The parameters studied were implant survival, prosthesis stability, marginal bone loss at teeth and implants, treatment complications, need for dental treatment, and patient's satisfaction with the outcome.
RESULTS: The cumulative survival rate was 91%, when all 27 patients were assessed, that is, including the 10 dropouts. Of the 69 inserted and followed implants (Brånemark system; Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden), six failed (8.7%) during the 20-year period, four during the first decade, and the remaining two during the second. A majority (n=4) of the losses were due to implant fractures, two after 8 years, and two after 17 years. In all, 10 of the original fixed bridges being followed (n=24) remained in function during the entire investigation period, whereas 12 were exchanged for new constructions after an average of 7 years. The mean marginal bone loss at teeth was 0.7 mm, and at implants it was 1.0 mm. The major complication observed during the second decade was veneer material fractures, which occurred 14 times in six patients. Component loosening and abutment- and bridge-locking screw fractures were the second most common problems seen, indicating material/component fatigue. Most patients were satisfied with their treatment and many mentioned that they did not think of the constructions as anything but a part of their own body.
CONCLUSION: Over the decades, treatment of partially edentulous jaws with turned titanium implants seems to function well and to provide patients with good support for fixed short-span bridge constructions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17100743     DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00019.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res        ISSN: 1523-0899            Impact factor:   3.932


  14 in total

1.  Cumulative survival rate of Astra Tech implants: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Jung-Soo Kim; Joo-Yeon Sohn; Jung-Chul Park; Ui-Won Jung; Chang-Sung Kim; Jae-Hoon Lee; June-Sung Shim; Keun-Woo Lee; Seong-Ho Choi
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 2.614

2.  Patient satisfaction with oral implant rehabilitation: evaluation of responses to a questionnaire.

Authors:  Susanna Annibali; Anna Rita Vestri; Annalisa Pilotto; Gerardo La Monaca; Stefano Di Carlo; Maria Paola Cristalli
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2011-02-13

3.  Complication incidence of two implant systems up to six years: a comparison between internal and external connection implants.

Authors:  Sung-Wook Chae; Young-Sung Kim; Yong-Moo Lee; Won-Kyung Kim; Young-Kyoo Lee; Su-Hwan Kim
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.614

Review 4.  Erythritol-Enriched Air-Polishing Powder for the Surgical Treatment of Peri-Implantitis.

Authors:  Silvio Taschieri; Roberto Weinstein; Massimo Del Fabbro; Stefano Corbella
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2015-05-06

Review 5.  Titanium surfaces with nanostructures influence on osteoblasts proliferation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Maxim Goldman; Gintaras Juodzbalys; Valdas Vilkinis
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2014-10-01

6.  Clinical, microbiological, and immunological aspects of healthy versus peri-implantitis tissue in full arch reconstruction patients: a prospective cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Javier Ata-Ali; Antonio Juan Flichy-Fernández; Teresa Alegre-Domingo; Fadi Ata-Ali; Jose Palacio; Miguel Peñarrocha-Diago
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 2.757

7.  Ag-plasma modification enhances bone apposition around titanium dental implants: an animal study in Labrador dogs.

Authors:  Shichong Qiao; Huiliang Cao; Xu Zhao; Hueiwen Lo; Longfei Zhuang; Yingxin Gu; Junyu Shi; Xuanyong Liu; Hongchang Lai
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2015-01-14

8.  Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years' function.

Authors:  Tadashi Horikawa; Tetsurou Odatsu; Takatoshi Itoh; Yoshiki Soejima; Hutoshi Morinaga; Naruyoshi Abe; Naoyuki Tsuchiya; Toshikazu Iijima; Takashi Sawase
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2017-09-05

9.  Evaluation of bone healing on sandblasted and Acid etched implants coated with nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite: an in vivo study in rabbit femur.

Authors:  Lory Melin Svanborg; Luiz Meirelles; Victoria Franke Stenport; Per Kjellin; Fredrik Currie; Martin Andersson; Ann Wennerberg
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2014-03-02

10.  Three-dimensional modeling of removal torque and fracture progression around implants.

Authors:  Kohei Murase; Patrik Stenlund; Peter Thomsen; Jukka Lausmaa; Anders Palmquist
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 3.896

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.