BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Graft harvest with or without the middle hepatic vein (MHV) affects venous return and function of the remaining liver. The aims of this study are to compare the remnant liver volume and spleen changes in the donors of different types of graft harvest and to evaluate the influence of resection with or without the MHV on the remnant liver volume regeneration, spleen volume change and serum total bilirubin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 165 donors were grouped according to the type of graft harvest: 88 donors underwent left lateral segmentectomy (LLS), 10 donors underwent extend LLS or left lobectomy (LL), and 67 donors underwent right lobectomy (RL). Groups LLS and LL were later combined as group LH (left hepatectomy, n = 98). There were 68 men and 97 women. The mean age was 32.9 +/- 8.1 yr. The total liver volume (LV) and spleen volume (S1) before graft harvest, graft weight (GW), regenerated liver volume (LV(6m)) and spleen volume (S2) six months post-donation were calculated. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the regenerated liver volume six months postoperation (LV(6m)) and recovery ratio (LV(6m)/LV x 100%) among the different groups, albeit significant smaller LV(6m) in both groups compared with the initial liver volume was noted. Postoperative spleen volume (S2), average spleen ratio (S2/S1) and spleen change ratio were significantly larger and higher in group RL than in group LH. A significant increase in spleen volume was noted in both groups six months after graft harvest. A significantly higher TB in group RL (4.1 +/- 1.7 mg/dL, range: 1.4-8.5 mg/dL) was noted compared with that of group LH (1.6 +/- 1.0 mg/dL, range: 0.7-6.2 mg/dL). CONCLUSION: There was a significant increase in the regenerated remnant liver and splenic volumes six months postoperation in all types of hepatectomy following living donor hepatectomy, and there was no difference in the mean TB levels among donors whether the MHV was included or not in the graft.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Graft harvest with or without the middle hepatic vein (MHV) affects venous return and function of the remaining liver. The aims of this study are to compare the remnant liver volume and spleen changes in the donors of different types of graft harvest and to evaluate the influence of resection with or without the MHV on the remnant liver volume regeneration, spleen volume change and serum total bilirubin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 165 donors were grouped according to the type of graft harvest: 88 donors underwent left lateral segmentectomy (LLS), 10 donors underwent extend LLS or left lobectomy (LL), and 67 donors underwent right lobectomy (RL). Groups LLS and LL were later combined as group LH (left hepatectomy, n = 98). There were 68 men and 97 women. The mean age was 32.9 +/- 8.1 yr. The total liver volume (LV) and spleen volume (S1) before graft harvest, graft weight (GW), regenerated liver volume (LV(6m)) and spleen volume (S2) six months post-donation were calculated. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the regenerated liver volume six months postoperation (LV(6m)) and recovery ratio (LV(6m)/LV x 100%) among the different groups, albeit significant smaller LV(6m) in both groups compared with the initial liver volume was noted. Postoperative spleen volume (S2), average spleen ratio (S2/S1) and spleen change ratio were significantly larger and higher in group RL than in group LH. A significant increase in spleen volume was noted in both groups six months after graft harvest. A significantly higher TB in group RL (4.1 +/- 1.7 mg/dL, range: 1.4-8.5 mg/dL) was noted compared with that of group LH (1.6 +/- 1.0 mg/dL, range: 0.7-6.2 mg/dL). CONCLUSION: There was a significant increase in the regenerated remnant liver and splenic volumes six months postoperation in all types of hepatectomy following living donor hepatectomy, and there was no difference in the mean TB levels among donors whether the MHV was included or not in the graft.
Authors: Yuen Ki Fong; See Ching Chan; Tan To Cheung; Wing Chiu Dai; Kenneth S H Chok; Albert C Y Chan; William W Sharr; Chung Mau Lo Journal: Hepatol Int Date: 2012-11-14 Impact factor: 6.047
Authors: Gregory T Everson; John C Hoefs; Claus U Niemann; Kim M Olthoff; Robert Dupuis; Shannon Lauriski; Andrea Herman; Norah Milne; Brenda W Gillespie; Nathan P Goodrich; James E Everhart Journal: Liver Transpl Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 5.799