BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an optional treatment for patients awaiting liver transplantation (LTX). The study evaluates the efficacy of RFA in the explanted liver and its effect on patient outcome. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Forty-seven patients underwent RFA and were listed for transplant between January 1998 and May 2003. The patients were divided into two groups: transplanted and non-transplanted. Both groups were evaluated in terms of tumor characteristics, recurrence, mortality rate, and time on the waiting list. The ablation sites in the explanted livers were examined for percentage of necrosis by Hematoxylin & Eosin (H&E) stain and by TUNEL stain. RESULTS: Transplantation was carried out in 35 patients (74.5%). Ten patients (21.3%) died before transplant or were removed from the wait list, while two patients (4.2%) are still listed. Mortality and tumor-related mortality were significantly higher in the non-transplanted group. The time spent on the waiting list was longer in the non-transplanted patients (350 vs. 186 d average, p = 0.0345). Thirty-eight ablation sites were examined in the explanted livers. The percentage of tumor necrosis by TUNEL staining was 19.6% higher than that reported by H&E staining. After TUNEL staining, 28 sites (73.7%) had more than 90% necrosis, eight sites (21.0%) had 50-90%, and two sites (5.3%) had less than 50% necrosis. CONCLUSIONS: RFA and LTX can be used successfully in HCC patients, and in most cases, tumor necrosis can be achieved with ultrasound-guided RFA. H&E stain tends to under-represent the amount of tumor necrosis on the ablation sites. Survival of RFA patients after LTX is excellent.
BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an optional treatment for patients awaiting liver transplantation (LTX). The study evaluates the efficacy of RFA in the explanted liver and its effect on patient outcome. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Forty-seven patients underwent RFA and were listed for transplant between January 1998 and May 2003. The patients were divided into two groups: transplanted and non-transplanted. Both groups were evaluated in terms of tumor characteristics, recurrence, mortality rate, and time on the waiting list. The ablation sites in the explanted livers were examined for percentage of necrosis by Hematoxylin & Eosin (H&E) stain and by TUNEL stain. RESULTS: Transplantation was carried out in 35 patients (74.5%). Ten patients (21.3%) died before transplant or were removed from the wait list, while two patients (4.2%) are still listed. Mortality and tumor-related mortality were significantly higher in the non-transplanted group. The time spent on the waiting list was longer in the non-transplanted patients (350 vs. 186 d average, p = 0.0345). Thirty-eight ablation sites were examined in the explanted livers. The percentage of tumor necrosis by TUNEL staining was 19.6% higher than that reported by H&E staining. After TUNEL staining, 28 sites (73.7%) had more than 90% necrosis, eight sites (21.0%) had 50-90%, and two sites (5.3%) had less than 50% necrosis. CONCLUSIONS: RFA and LTX can be used successfully in HCCpatients, and in most cases, tumor necrosis can be achieved with ultrasound-guided RFA. H&E stain tends to under-represent the amount of tumor necrosis on the ablation sites. Survival of RFA patients after LTX is excellent.
Authors: Sudeep Tanwar; Shahid A Khan; Vijay Paul Bob Grover; Catherine Gwilt; Belinda Smith; Ashley Brown Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2009-11-28 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Juan C Rodríguez-Sanjuán; Francisco González; Carlos Juanco; Luis A Herrera; Mercedes López-Bautista; Mónica González-Noriega; Elena García-Somacarrera; Javier Figols; Manuel Gómez-Fleitas; Martín Silván Journal: World J Surg Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Vincenza Granata; Roberta Fusco; Simona Salati; Antonella Petrillo; Elio Di Bernardo; Roberta Grassi; Raffaele Palaia; Ginevra Danti; Michelearcangelo La Porta; Matteo Cadossi; Gorana Gašljević; Gregor Sersa; Francesco Izzo Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-24 Impact factor: 3.390