Literature DB >> 17100717

Quantification of a low cellular immune response to aid in identification of pediatric liver transplant recipients at high-risk for EBV infection.

Timothy C Lee1, John A Goss, Cliona M Rooney, Helen E Heslop, Neal R Barshes, Yvette M Caldwell, Adrian P Gee, Jaymee D Scott, Barbara Savoldo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Uncontrolled EBV infection leading to lymphoproliferative disease is a significant cause of morbidity in pediatric orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) recipients. Herein, we describe the use of a novel immune assay, which quantifies the lymphocyte immune response and correlates the value to risk for EBV infection.
METHODS: All patient data were prospectively collected between 2003 and 2005. The study included 18 pediatric liver transplant recipients, seven males and 11 females with a mean follow-up of 47 months post-OLT. Patient EBV load was monitored using real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR). The ATP release (ng/mL) of CD3+ lymphocytes after mitogenic stimulation with phytohemagluttinin (PHA; Cylex Corporation) was used to quantitate patient immune response. Patients were stratified by EBV load: low (<1000 copies/microg DNA), medium (1000-4000 copies/microg DNA), and high (>4000 copies/microg DNA).
RESULTS: Patients with low EBV loads had a significantly (p < 0.04) stronger immune response to PHA than patients with EBV load >1000 copies/microg DNA. Further analysis demonstrated that patients with ATP level <125 ng/mL had 100% probability of an EBV titer >4000 copies/microg DNA, when compared with 22% if the ATP level was between 125 and 400 ng/mL or only 15% if >400 ng/mL (p < 0.05). When immunosuppression was reduced, we observed an increase of the ATP release that correlated with a decrease of the EBV viral load.
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this study investigates the use of a lymphocyte activation assay to closely measure the immunosuppression status of pediatric liver transplant recipients. Because measurement of EBV DNA load as a single parameter has a poor positive predictive value for development of PTLD, the association of these assays may be of help in the identification of patients at risk for PTLD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17100717     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2006.00537.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transplant        ISSN: 0902-0063            Impact factor:   2.863


  9 in total

Review 1.  How I treat EBV lymphoproliferation.

Authors:  Helen E Heslop
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 2.  Using Epstein-Barr viral load assays to diagnose, monitor, and prevent posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder.

Authors:  Margaret L Gulley; Weihua Tang
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 3.  Epstein-Barr virus-related lymphoproliferative disorders.

Authors:  Nina D Wagner-Johnston; Richard F Ambinder
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 4.  Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease following liver transplantation.

Authors:  Kala Y Kamdar; Cliona M Rooney; Helen E Heslop
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.640

5.  EBV-specific CD8+ T cells from asymptomatic pediatric thoracic transplant patients carrying chronic high EBV loads display contrasting features: activated phenotype and exhausted function.

Authors:  Camila Macedo; Steven A Webber; Albert D Donnenberg; Iulia Popescu; Yun Hua; Michael Green; David Rowe; Louise Smith; Maria M Brooks; Diana Metes
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 5.422

6.  Post-transplant primary central nervous system lymphoma after Epstein-Barr virus cerebellitis.

Authors:  Cristina Valencia-Sanchez; Kristen K Steenerson; Katalin Kelemen; Robert Orenstein; Shimon Kusne; Marie F Grill
Journal:  J Neurovirol       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 2.643

7.  Risk factors for rejection and infection in pediatric liver transplantation.

Authors:  R W Shepherd; Y Turmelle; M Nadler; J A Lowell; M R Narkewicz; S V McDiarmid; R Anand; C Song
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2007-12-19       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  The impact of EBV load on T-cell immunity in pediatric thoracic transplant recipients.

Authors:  Camila Macedo; Adriana Zeevi; Carol Bentlejewski; Iulia Popescu; Michael Green; David Rowe; Louise Smith; Steve Webber; Diana Metes
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 9.  Laboratory assays for Epstein-Barr virus-related disease.

Authors:  Margaret L Gulley; Weihua Tang
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 5.568

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.