Literature DB >> 17100540

Fear and pain: investigating the interaction between aversive states.

Kevin E Vowles1, Daniel W McNeil, John T Sorrell, Suzanne M Lawrence.   

Abstract

Pain and fear often co-occur and appear to interact, although the nature and direction of their relation is not clearly delineated. The present study investigates how exposure to the experience of one of these states subsequently affects responding to the other. Pressure stimulation and carbon dioxide-enriched air (CO2) were used to induce pain and fear, respectively, in 48 healthy individuals. The order in which the stimuli were introduced was manipulated, as was the CO2 level. Measures of overt behavior, physiological responding, and self-report were obtained; analyses of stimuli effects generally supported their ability to produce pain or fear. Results indicate that the stimulus rated as the most aversive, the higher level of CO2, led to the highest levels of distressed responding across dependent measures. This pattern was replicated for the stimuli found to be less aversive (i.e., pressure stimulation and low-level CO2, respectively). The authors conclude that fear and pain, in and of themselves, do not dictate the nature of their interaction; the most important factor is how aversive they are perceived to be in relation to one another. (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17100540     DOI: 10.1037/0021-843X.115.4.821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol        ISSN: 0021-843X


  8 in total

1.  Interaction of intensity and order regarding painful events.

Authors:  Brandon N Kyle; Daniel W McNeil; Benjamin J Weinstein; James D Mark
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2009-03-12

Review 2.  Neurobiology of aversive states.

Authors:  Erin N Umberg; Emmanuel N Pothos
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-05-01

3.  Thresholds and tolerance of physical pain among young adults who self-injure.

Authors:  Katrina McCoy; William Fremouw; Daniel W McNeil
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.037

4.  Sensory, Affective, and Catastrophizing Reactions to Multiple Stimulus Modalities: Results from the Oklahoma Study of Native American Pain Risk.

Authors:  Jamie L Rhudy; Edward W Lannon; Bethany L Kuhn; Shreela Palit; Michael F Payne; Cassandra A Sturycz; Natalie Hellman; Yvette M Güereca; Tyler A Toledo; Heather B Coleman; Kathryn A Thompson; Jessica M Fisher; Samuel P Herbig; Ky'Lee B Barnoski; Lucinda Chee; Joanna O Shadlow
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 5.820

5.  Pain patients and who they live with: a correlational study of coresidence patterns and pain interference.

Authors:  Jacob M Vigil; Patricia Pendleton; Patrick Coulombe; Kevin E Vowles; Joe Alcock; Bruce W Smith
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.037

Review 6.  Autonomic arousal and experimentally induced pain: a critical review of the literature.

Authors:  Brandon Nicholas Kyle; Daniel W McNeil
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 3.037

7.  Circadian Variation of Migraine Attack Onset Affects fMRI Brain Response to Fearful Faces.

Authors:  Daniel Baksa; Edina Szabo; Natalia Kocsel; Attila Galambos; Andrea Edit Edes; Dorottya Pap; Terezia Zsombok; Mate Magyar; Kinga Gecse; Dora Dobos; Lajos Rudolf Kozak; Gyorgy Bagdy; Gyongyi Kokonyei; Gabriella Juhasz
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Development and validation of the Brief Assessment of Distress about Pain.

Authors:  Laura L Quentin; Cecelia I Nelson; Casey D Wright; Matthew C Arias; Manasi M Mittinty; Daniel W McNeil
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 3.931

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.