Literature DB >> 17100384

Comparison of validity, and responsiveness between general and disease-specific quality of life instruments (Thai version) in knee osteoarthritis.

Boonsin Tangtrakulwanich1, Sutti Wiwatwongwana, Virasakdi Chongsuvivatwong, Alan F Geater.   

Abstract

Short-form 36 (SF-36) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) are common instruments for measuring quality of life (QoL) in patients with knee osteoarthritis. The goal of the present study was to compare the performance of both instruments in evaluating QoL in patients with knee osteoarthritis as diagnosed by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria. Treatment included nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and patient education for 6 weeks. Face-to-face interview by an orthopaedist was done at baseline and after treatment, including collection of demographic data and use of both SF-36 and WOMAC questionnaires. Evaluation of instrument performance included reliability, validity, and responsiveness measures. Reliability was tested by analysis of internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha at baseline and after treatment. Construct validity was computed by determining the correlation between each domain of SF-36 and WOMAC (Pearson's test). Responsiveness was compared between baseline and after treatment of both SF-36 and WOMAC in each domain using the paired t test. Fifty-two patients (8 men, 48 women) with a mean age of 58.4 years were included in the present study. About 75% of subjects had less than secondary education levels and most were from agricultural communities. Sixty-four percent had mild grade knee osteoarthritis. The internal consistency of WOMAC revealed good levels of reliability, both at baseline and after treatment, in all dimensions. The reliability of SF-36 was relatively low, especially in the role physical and bodily pain dimensions (Cronbach's alpha < 0.700). Construct validity between each dimension in SF-36 and WOMAC demonstrated coefficients ranging from -0.05 to -0.409. Both WOMAC and SF-36 showed good responsiveness when comparing scores before and after treatment in all domains. In conclusion, both the Thai version WOMAC and SF-36 were valid, reliable, and sensitive to change in evaluating QoL in Thai patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17100384

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Assoc Thai        ISSN: 0125-2208


  6 in total

Review 1.  Knee osteoarthritis related pain: a narrative review of diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Ali M Alshami
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2014-01

2.  A theory of planned behavior-based intervention to improve quality of life in patients with knee/hip osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mohsen Saffari; Mohammad Kazem Emami Meybodi; Hormoz Sanaeinasab; Ali Karami; Amir H Pakpour; Harold G Koenig
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  Validation of the Thai Version of a Work-related Quality of Life Scale in the Nursing Profession.

Authors:  Poramate Sirisawasd; Naesinee Chaiear; Nutjaree Pratheepawanit Johns; Jiraporn Khiewyoo
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2014-03-22

4.  The Malay version of SF-36 health survey instrument: testing data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and validity in post-coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery patients at the National Heart Institute (Institut Jantung Negara-IJN), Kuala Lumpur.

Authors:  Ahmad Farouk Musa; Mohamed Shajahan Mohamed Yasin; Julian Smith; Mohd Azhari Yakub; Rusli Bin Nordin
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.186

5.  Associations of lifestyle factors, disease history and awareness with health-related quality of life in a Thai population.

Authors:  Prin Vathesatogkit; Piyamitr Sritara; Merel Kimman; Bunlue Hengprasith; Tai E-Shyong; Hwee-Lin Wee; Mark Woodward
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Thai SF-36 health survey: tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and validity in healthy men and women.

Authors:  Lynette L-Y Lim; Sam-Ang Seubsman; Adrian Sleigh
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 3.186

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.