Literature DB >> 17099482

Five critical decisions in breast augmentation using five measurements in 5 minutes: the high five decision support process.

John B Tebbetts1, William P Adams.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgeons' decisions impact patient outcomes and implant effects on tissues over time. Tissue assessment systems that provide quantitative, objective data enable objective rather than subjective decisions. First-generation dimensional systems for breast augmentation defined a desired result dimensionally and recommended an implant to force tissues to the desired result. A second-generation system, the TEPID system, defines measurements to match the implant to the patient's tissue characteristics, instead of forcing tissues to a desired result. This study defines a third-generation decision support process that prioritizes five critical decisions, identifies five key measurements, and completes all preoperative assessment and operative planning decisions in breast augmentation in 5 minutes or less.
METHODS: Key decision parameters and data from more than 2300 primary augmentations planned using the TEPID system were analyzed to define the five most critical decisions that affect reoperation rates and risks of uncorrectable deformities and to define a decision support process using five critical measurements.
RESULTS: In 1664 cases with up to 7 years of follow-up, the overall reoperation rate was 3 percent, and the reoperation rate for implant size exchange was 0.2 percent. The junior author's (Adams) clinical experience includes more than 300 augmentations with up to 6 years of follow-up using this system, with an overall reoperation rate of 2.8 percent.
CONCLUSION: The High Five decision support process prioritizes five critical decisions in breast augmentation and enables surgeons to address all preoperative assessment and operative planning decisions in breast augmentation in 5 minutes or less.

Entities:  

Year:  2006        PMID: 17099482     DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000191163.19379.63

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  8 in total

1.  Breast augmentation: A geographical comparison.

Authors:  Janae L Maher; Della C Bennett; Laura L Bennett; Peter Grothaus; Raman C Mahabir
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2010

2.  Letter-to-the-Editor: A Simple Preoperative Marking of Implant Augmentation Mammoplasty: The Semicircle Method.

Authors:  Paul Beaineh; Bishara Atiyeh
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 2.326

3.  Patient-Reported Outcomes after Subpectoral Breast Augmentation with Microtextured or Macrotextured Implants Using the BREAST-Q.

Authors:  Alice Teixeira Leite; Miguel Sabino-Neto; Vanessa Contato Lopes Resende; Daniela Francescato Veiga; Lydia Masako Ferreira
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2022-05-27

4.  Prevention of implant malposition in inframammary augmentation mammaplasty.

Authors:  Yoon Ji Kim; Yang Woo Kim; Young Woo Cheon
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2014-07-15

Review 5.  Revision Breast Augmentation.

Authors:  Brad D Denney; Alvin B Cohn; Jeremy W Bosworth; Pallavi A Kumbla
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 2.314

6.  A Predictive Model for Determining Permanent Implant Size During 2-Stage Implant Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Kyle S Gabrick; Nickolay P Markov; Fouad Chouairi; Robin Wu; Sarah M Persing; Paul Abraham; Tomer Avraham; Michael Alperovich
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-05-21

7.  Reduced Pain and Accelerated Recovery Following Primary Breast Augmentation With Lightweight Breast Implants.

Authors:  Orel Govrin-Yehudain; Yossef Matanis; Jacky Govrin-Yehudain
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 4.283

Review 8.  Lightweight breast implants: a novel solution for breast augmentation and reconstruction mammaplasty.

Authors:  Jacky Govrin-Yehudain; Haim Dvir; Dina Preise; Orel Govrin-Yehudain; Dael Govreen-Segal
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 4.283

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.