Literature DB >> 17099450

Is participation in occupational physical activity associated with lifestyle physical activity levels?

Judy Kruger1, Michelle M Yore, Barbara E Ainsworth, Caroline A Macera.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Little is known about the prevalence of lifestyle physical activity (PA) by occupational PA (mostly sitting, walking, or heavy labor).
METHODS: Descriptive and adjusted multivariable logistic regression analysis of lifestyle PA (regularly active, irregularly active, inactive) and occupational activity was used (N = 6,360).
RESULTS: The prevalence of regular lifestyle activity was 45.7% among those who sit/stand, 49.6% among walkers, and 59.7% among heavy laborers. The regression analysis showed that adults working in heavy labor were almost twice as likely to be regularly active as those who sit/stand.
CONCLUSION: Contrary to expectation, adults who engage in physically demanding work appear to be more active outside the job. Those who are sedentary at work could benefit from having access to opportunities for PA during the workday and trying to engage in activity outside of work hours.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17099450     DOI: 10.1097/01.jom.0000245919.37147.79

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1076-2752            Impact factor:   2.162


  9 in total

1.  Leisure-time physical activity in relation to occupational physical activity among women.

Authors:  Christine C Ekenga; Christine G Parks; Lauren E Wilson; Dale P Sandler
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  Interrelations of socioeconomic position and occupational and leisure-time physical activity in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Authors:  Kathleen Y Wolin; Gary G Bennett
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2008-03

3.  Occupational risk of overweight and obesity: an analysis of the Australian Health Survey.

Authors:  Margaret A Allman-Farinelli; Tien Chey; Dafna Merom; Adrian E Bauman
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 2.646

4.  Barriers to participation in a worksite wellness program.

Authors:  Ashley Lynne Person; Sarah Elizabeth Colby; Jessica Ann Bulova; Janie Whitehurst Eubanks
Journal:  Nutr Res Pract       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 1.926

5.  Farming activities and carrying and lifting: the Agricultural Health Study.

Authors:  Elizabeth F Racine; Sarah B Laditka; Jacek Dmochowski; Michael C R Alavanja; Duck-chul Lee; Jane A Hoppin
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2012-01

6.  Classification of occupational activity categories using accelerometry: NHANES 2003-2004.

Authors:  Jeremy A Steeves; Catrine Tudor-Locke; Rachel A Murphy; George A King; Eugene C Fitzhugh; Tamara B Harris
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 6.457

7.  Day-to-day pattern of work and leisure time physical behaviours: are low socioeconomic status adults couch potatoes or work warriors?

Authors:  Charlotte Lund Rasmussen; Dorothea Dumuid; Karel Hron; Nidhi Gupta; Marie Birk Jørgensen; Kirsten Nabe-Nielsen; Andreas Holtermann
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Does Physically Demanding Work Hinder a Physically Active Lifestyle in Low Socioeconomic Workers? A Compositional Data Analysis Based on Accelerometer Data.

Authors:  Charlotte Lund Rasmussen; Javier Palarea-Albaladejo; Adrian Bauman; Nidhi Gupta; Kirsten Nabe-Nielsen; Marie Birk Jørgensen; Andreas Holtermann
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Differences in Habitual Physical Activity Behavior between Students from Different Vocational Education Tracks and the Association with Cognitive Performance.

Authors:  Rianne H J Golsteijn; Hieronymus J M Gijselaers; Hans H C M Savelberg; Amika S Singh; Renate H M de Groot
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.