Literature DB >> 17099376

Addition of local antiseptic spray to parenteral antibiotic regimen reduces the incidence of stomal infection following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: A randomized controlled trial.

Nerukav V Radhakrishnan1, Achuth H Shenoy, Ivor Cartmill, Ravi K Sharma, Regi George, David N Foster, Laura Quest.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the effectiveness of local antiseptic spray with or without a three-dose antibiotic regimen in the prevention of stomal infection following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.
METHODS: Ninety-six patients were randomized into three groups: A, intravenous cefuroxime 750 mg just before the procedure followed by two further doses every 8 h; B, single application of povidone-iodine (Betadine) antiseptic spray; C, combination of A and B. The stomal site was examined at midweek and at the end of week 1 for evidence of infection using a validated scoring system. Fisher's exact test was used for analysis of primary end point, namely, stomal infection at midweek and at the end of week 1. Logistic regression models were used for secondary analysis to consider the effects of diabetes, acid suppressants, steroids, age and sex on outcome.
RESULTS: Group A had 34 patients, group B had 28 and group C had 34. Age, sex and indications in groups A, B and C are broadly comparable. Stomal infection was 32% in group B vs. groups A (6%) and C (9%) (P = 0.0114) at midweek, and 3% in group C vs. 32% each in groups A and B (P = 0.0013) at the end of week 1. Cumulative infections (n) at the end of week 1 were lower in group C (3) (9%) than in groups A (11) (32%) and B (12) (43%) (P = 0.003). No significant difference was observed between the three groups in terms of the number of patients who were given antibiotics for other indications (P = 0.363). By logistic regression only diabetes, but not other covariates, seems to have a significant effect on stomal infection (odds ratio, 33.34; 95% CI, 4.33-256.7).
CONCLUSION: A combination of cefuroxime and Betadine spray significantly reduces stomal infection following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy at the end of week 1. Both the antibiotic group (A) and the combined group (C) did well compared with the Betadine only group (B) at midweek.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17099376     DOI: 10.1097/01.meg.0000243871.48831.00

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0954-691X            Impact factor:   2.566


  4 in total

Review 1.  Systemic antimicrobial prophylaxis for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  Allyson Lipp; Gail Lusardi
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-11-14

2.  Airway infection predisposes to peristomal infection after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with high concordance between sputum and wound isolates.

Authors:  Chiao-Hsiung Chuang; Kuei-Hsiang Hung; Jen-Ru Chen; Chiung-Yu Chen; Ai-Wen Kao; Wei-Lun Chang; Jiunn-Jong Wu; Bor-Shyang Sheu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  [The frequency of wound infections after PEG-placement and utilization of glycogel wound dressing: a randomized controlled trial].

Authors:  Gerhard Aschl; Andreas Kirchgatterer; Manfred Fleischer; Maximilian Hinterreiter; Dietmar Hubner; Wolfgang Kranewitter; Bernhard Stadler; Peter Knoflach
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.704

4.  Different clinical utility of oropharyngeal bacterial screening prior to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in oncological and neurological patients.

Authors:  Radek Kroupa; Jana Jurankova; Milan Dastych; Michal Senkyrik; Tomas Pavlik; Jitka Prokesova; Marketa Jecmenova; Jiri Dolina; Ales Hep
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.411

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.