Literature DB >> 17099022

CFTR genotype as a predictor of prognosis in cystic fibrosis.

Edward F McKone1, Christopher H Goss, Moira L Aitken.   

Abstract

STUDY RATIONALE: Certain CFTR genotypes are associated with reduced mortality. The accuracy of using CFTR genotype as a predictor of survival and the mechanisms through which CFTR genotype influences survival are unknown. PARTICIPANTS: All patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) enrolled in the US Cystic Fibrosis Foundation national registry between 1993 and 2002.
DESIGN: We examined the prognostic value of CFTR genotype, grouped into "high-risk" and "low-risk" categories based on the effect of their CFTR genotype on phenotype and protein production. MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS: Clinical and genetic data were available from 15,651 patients with CF. Patients with a high-risk CFTR genotype had a greater than twofold increased risk of death compared to patients with a low-risk CFTR genotype (relative risk, 2.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.77 to 2.84; p < 0.001). This association was partly explained by lung function, nutritional status, pancreatic insufficiency, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonization. Of the 1,672 patients who died, median age at death for the high-risk CFTR genotype was 24.2 years (interquartile range, 18.4 to 32.0 years) and for the low-risk CFTR genotype was 37.6 years (interquartile range, 28.8 to 47.9 years; p < 0.001). The positive predictive value of this classification method as a test to identify patients who died before or after their 30th birthday was 69% (95% CI, 67 to 72%) with a negative predictive value of 71% (95% CI, 60 to 80%).
CONCLUSIONS: Grouping patients into high-risk and low-risk CFTR genotype categories is associated with significant differences in survival and median age at death. These differences are not fully explained by lung function, nutritional measures, pancreatic insufficiency, or P aeruginosa colonization. Modest reassurance about the likelihood of a milder than average course can be provided for CF patients with a low-risk CFTR genotype, although it should be acknowledged that substantial phenotypic variability exists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17099022     DOI: 10.1378/chest.130.5.1441

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  44 in total

1.  Initial Pseudomonas aeruginosa treatment failure is associated with exacerbations in cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Nicole Mayer-Hamblett; Richard A Kronmal; Ronald L Gibson; Margaret Rosenfeld; George Retsch-Bogart; Miriam M Treggiari; Jane L Burns; Umer Khan; Bonnie W Ramsey
Journal:  Pediatr Pulmonol       Date:  2011-08-09

2.  What and when to collect from infants with cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Iolo Doull
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 3.  Advancing outcome measures for the new era of drug development in cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Nicole Mayer-Hamblett; Bonnie W Ramsey; Richard A Kronmal
Journal:  Proc Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2007-08-01

4.  Molecular testing for cystic fibrosis carrier status practice guidelines: recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors.

Authors:  Elinor Langfelder-Schwind; Barbara Karczeski; Michelle N Strecker; Joy Redman; Elaine A Sugarman; Christina Zaleski; Trisha Brown; Steven Keiles; Amy Powers; Sumheda Ghate; Rebecca Darrah
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 5.  Genetic variation and clinical heterogeneity in cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Mitchell L Drumm; Assem G Ziady; Pamela B Davis
Journal:  Annu Rev Pathol       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 23.472

6.  Correlating Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator Function with Clinical Features to Inform Precision Treatment of Cystic Fibrosis.

Authors:  Allison F McCague; Karen S Raraigh; Matthew J Pellicore; Emily F Davis-Marcisak; Taylor A Evans; Sangwoo T Han; Zhongzhou Lu; Anya T Joynt; Neeraj Sharma; Carlo Castellani; Joseph M Collaco; Mary Corey; Michelle H Lewis; Chris M Penland; Johanna M Rommens; Anne L Stephenson; Patrick R Sosnay; Garry R Cutting
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 7.  Consensus on the use and interpretation of cystic fibrosis mutation analysis in clinical practice.

Authors:  C Castellani; H Cuppens; M Macek; J J Cassiman; E Kerem; P Durie; E Tullis; B M Assael; C Bombieri; A Brown; T Casals; M Claustres; G R Cutting; E Dequeker; J Dodge; I Doull; P Farrell; C Ferec; E Girodon; M Johannesson; B Kerem; M Knowles; A Munck; P F Pignatti; D Radojkovic; P Rizzotti; M Schwarz; M Stuhrmann; M Tzetis; J Zielenski; J S Elborn
Journal:  J Cyst Fibros       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Classic respiratory disease but atypical diagnostic testing distinguishes adult presentation of cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Claire L Keating; Xinhua Liu; Emily A Dimango
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  How many genetic variants remain to be discovered?

Authors:  Yudi Pawitan; Ku Chee Seng; Patrik K E Magnusson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Diabetes as a determinant of mortality in cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Parinya Chamnan; Brian S F Shine; Charles S Haworth; Diana Bilton; Amanda I Adler
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 19.112

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.