BACKGROUND: The transition from a whole-cell to a 5-component acellular pertussis vaccine provided a unique opportunity to compare the effect that each type of vaccine had on the incidence of pertussis, under routine conditions, among children less than 10 years of age. METHODS: Analyses were based on passive surveillance data collected between 1995 and 2005. The incidence of pertussis by year and birth cohort was compiled according to age during the surveillance period. We determined the association between vaccine type (whole-cell, acellular or a combination of both) and the incidence of pertussis using Poisson regression analysis after controlling for age (< 1 year, 1-4 years and 5-9 years) and vaccination history (i.e., partial or complete). RESULTS: During 7 of the 11 years surveyed, infants (< 1 year of age) had the highest incidence of pertussis. Among children born after 1997, when acellular vaccines were introduced, the rates of pertussis were highest among infants and preschool children (1-4 years of age). Poisson regression analysis revealed that, in the group given either the whole-cell vaccine or a combination of both vaccines, the incidence of pertussis was lower among infants and preschool children than among school-aged children (5-9 years). The reverse was true in the group given only an acellular vaccine, with a higher incidence among infants and preschool children than among school-aged children. INTERPRETATION: These results suggest that current immunization practices may not be adequate in protecting infants and children less than 5 years of age against pertussis. Altering available acellular formulations or adopting immunization practices used in some European countries may increase the clinical effectiveness of routine pertussis vaccination programs among infants and preschool children.
BACKGROUND: The transition from a whole-cell to a 5-component acellular pertussis vaccine provided a unique opportunity to compare the effect that each type of vaccine had on the incidence of pertussis, under routine conditions, among children less than 10 years of age. METHODS: Analyses were based on passive surveillance data collected between 1995 and 2005. The incidence of pertussis by year and birth cohort was compiled according to age during the surveillance period. We determined the association between vaccine type (whole-cell, acellular or a combination of both) and the incidence of pertussis using Poisson regression analysis after controlling for age (< 1 year, 1-4 years and 5-9 years) and vaccination history (i.e., partial or complete). RESULTS: During 7 of the 11 years surveyed, infants (< 1 year of age) had the highest incidence of pertussis. Among children born after 1997, when acellular vaccines were introduced, the rates of pertussis were highest among infants and preschool children (1-4 years of age). Poisson regression analysis revealed that, in the group given either the whole-cell vaccine or a combination of both vaccines, the incidence of pertussis was lower among infants and preschool children than among school-aged children (5-9 years). The reverse was true in the group given only an acellular vaccine, with a higher incidence among infants and preschool children than among school-aged children. INTERPRETATION: These results suggest that current immunization practices may not be adequate in protecting infants and children less than 5 years of age against pertussis. Altering available acellular formulations or adopting immunization practices used in some European countries may increase the clinical effectiveness of routine pertussis vaccination programs among infants and preschool children.
Authors: G De Serres; R Shadmani; N Boulianne; B Duval; L Rochette; M Douville Fradet; S A Halperin Journal: Vaccine Date: 2001-04-06 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Patrick Olin; Lennart Gustafsson; Luis Barreto; Luc Hessel; T Christopher Mast; Annelies Van Rie; Hugues Bogaerts; Jann Storsaeter Journal: Vaccine Date: 2003-05-16 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Kevin L Schwartz; Jeffrey C Kwong; Shelley L Deeks; Michael A Campitelli; Frances B Jamieson; Alex Marchand-Austin; Therese A Stukel; Laura Rosella; Nick Daneman; Shelly Bolotin; Steven J Drews; Heather Rilkoff; Natasha S Crowcroft Journal: CMAJ Date: 2016-09-26 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Anna Bednarek; Anna Bodajko-Grochowska; Barbara Hasiec; Robert Klepacz; Katarzyna Szczekala; Danuta Zarzycka; Andrzej Emeryk Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-07-06 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Susanna Esposito; Paola Stefanelli; Norman K Fry; Giorgio Fedele; Qiushui He; Pauline Paterson; Tina Tan; Markus Knuf; Carlos Rodrigo; Catherine Weil Olivier; Katie L Flanagan; Ivan Hung; Iria Lutsar; Kathryn Edwards; Miguel O'Ryan; Nicola Principi Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2019-07-03 Impact factor: 7.561
Authors: Mohammad Alghounaim; Zainab Alsaffar; Abdulla Alfraij; Saadoun Bin-Hasan; Entesar Hussain Journal: Med Princ Pract Date: 2022-06-13 Impact factor: 2.132