OBJECTIVE:Resource utilization (RU) in the care of patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) is not well quantified. We present a cohort study to quantify in-hospital RU and analyze the role of tissue loss (TL), comorbidities, and vascular graft-related events (GREs) in patients undergoing peripheral bypass for CLI. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 1404 patients enrolled in a multicenter clinical trial (PREVENT III) ofvein bypass grafting for CLI was performed with analysis of RU during the 1-year follow-up period. Univariate and multivariable linear regressions were performed to determine RU predictors and outcomes. RESULTS: Compared with patients with rest pain, patients presenting with TL as the indication for bypass surgery had a longer index length of stay (mean, 9.8 vs 6.2 days), more rehospitalizations (mean, 1.6 vs 1.2), and a longer cumulative length of stay (mean, 27.7 vs 17.3 days; P < .0001 for all comparisons). Rehospitalizations over the ensuing year were for additional procedures (37.5%), wound infection (14.6%), graft failure (10.7%), and other cardiovascular (10%) and noncardiovascular (26%) reasons. Early GRE (stenosis > or =70%, thrombosis, revision, or major amputation within 30 days) occurred in 162 (11.5%) patients, resulting in a longer index length of stay (mean, 11.8 vs 8.6 days; P = .0002) and cumulative length of stay (mean, 25.9 vs 24.6 days; P = .0043), but no difference in the number of rehospitalizations (mean, 1.6 vs 1.5 days; P = .3272). During the 1-year follow-up, 554 (39.5%) patients had GREs, and this resulted in more rehospitalizations (mean, 2.1 vs 1.1; P < .0001) and a longer cumulative length of stay (mean, 28.2 vs 21.9 days; P < .0001) compared with patients without GRE. Multivariable analysis demonstrated the highly positive association of TL (hazard ratio [HR], 1.75) and early GRE (HR, 1.77) with the index length of stay, whereas comorbidities-namely, dialysis dependency (HR, 1.31), nonsmoking status (HR, 1.29), hypertension (HR, 1.26), and increasing age (HR, 1.01)-also had strong effects. The effect of TL and GRE on later RU (number of rehospitalizations and cumulative length of stay) was present but less pronounced than patient comorbidities (namely, dialysis). CONCLUSIONS: The stage of disease at presentation (TL vs rest pain) and the patency of the bypass graft (freedom from GRE) are critical determinants of RU over the first year after limb-salvage surgery. These effects predominate early (index length of stay) and persist through 1 year. Patient-specific factors, particularly dialysis-dependent renal failure, are also critical comorbidities affecting RU in these patients.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Resource utilization (RU) in the care of patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) is not well quantified. We present a cohort study to quantify in-hospital RU and analyze the role of tissue loss (TL), comorbidities, and vascular graft-related events (GREs) in patients undergoing peripheral bypass for CLI. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 1404 patients enrolled in a multicenter clinical trial (PREVENT III) of vein bypass grafting for CLI was performed with analysis of RU during the 1-year follow-up period. Univariate and multivariable linear regressions were performed to determine RU predictors and outcomes. RESULTS: Compared with patients with rest pain, patients presenting with TL as the indication for bypass surgery had a longer index length of stay (mean, 9.8 vs 6.2 days), more rehospitalizations (mean, 1.6 vs 1.2), and a longer cumulative length of stay (mean, 27.7 vs 17.3 days; P < .0001 for all comparisons). Rehospitalizations over the ensuing year were for additional procedures (37.5%), wound infection (14.6%), graft failure (10.7%), and other cardiovascular (10%) and noncardiovascular (26%) reasons. Early GRE (stenosis > or =70%, thrombosis, revision, or major amputation within 30 days) occurred in 162 (11.5%) patients, resulting in a longer index length of stay (mean, 11.8 vs 8.6 days; P = .0002) and cumulative length of stay (mean, 25.9 vs 24.6 days; P = .0043), but no difference in the number of rehospitalizations (mean, 1.6 vs 1.5 days; P = .3272). During the 1-year follow-up, 554 (39.5%) patients had GREs, and this resulted in more rehospitalizations (mean, 2.1 vs 1.1; P < .0001) and a longer cumulative length of stay (mean, 28.2 vs 21.9 days; P < .0001) compared with patients without GRE. Multivariable analysis demonstrated the highly positive association of TL (hazard ratio [HR], 1.75) and early GRE (HR, 1.77) with the index length of stay, whereas comorbidities-namely, dialysis dependency (HR, 1.31), nonsmoking status (HR, 1.29), hypertension (HR, 1.26), and increasing age (HR, 1.01)-also had strong effects. The effect of TL and GRE on later RU (number of rehospitalizations and cumulative length of stay) was present but less pronounced than patient comorbidities (namely, dialysis). CONCLUSIONS: The stage of disease at presentation (TL vs rest pain) and the patency of the bypass graft (freedom from GRE) are critical determinants of RU over the first year after limb-salvage surgery. These effects predominate early (index length of stay) and persist through 1 year. Patient-specific factors, particularly dialysis-dependent renal failure, are also critical comorbidities affecting RU in these patients.
Authors: Philip P Goodney; Lori L Travis; Benjamin S Brooke; Randall R DeMartino; David C Goodman; Elliott S Fisher; John D Birkmeyer Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Michael Sobel; Shinsuke Kikuchi; Lihua Chen; Gale L Tang; Tom N Wight; Richard D Kenagy Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2018-06-15 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Louis L Nguyen; Soma Brahmanandam; Dennis F Bandyk; Michael Belkin; Alexander W Clowes; Gregory L Moneta; Michael S Conte Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Louis L Nguyen; Nathanael Hevelone; Selwyn O Rogers; Dennis F Bandyk; Alexander W Clowes; Gregory L Moneta; Stuart Lipsitz; Michael S Conte Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-12-22 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Sanjay Misra; Mehdi H Shishehbor; Edwin A Takahashi; Herbert D Aronow; Luke P Brewster; Matthew C Bunte; Esther S H Kim; Jonathan R Lindner; Kathleen Rich Journal: Circulation Date: 2019-08-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Eric Benoit; Thomas F O'Donnell; Mark D Iafrati; Enrico Asher; Dennis F Bandyk; John W Hallett; Alan B Lumsden; Gregory J Pearl; Sean P Roddy; Krishnaswami Vijayaraghavan; Amit N Patel Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2011-09-27 Impact factor: 5.531
Authors: Jan Skóra; Artur Pupka; Dariusz Janczak; Piotr Barć; Tomasz Dawiskiba; Krzysztof Korta; Dagmara Baczyńska; Agnieszka Mastalerz-Migas; Jerzy Garcarek Journal: Arch Med Sci Date: 2014-07-23 Impact factor: 3.318