BACKGROUND: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a new therapy option for treatment of otherwise therapy-refractory major depressive disorder. However, the mechanism of central nervous action is poorly understood. Electroencephalographic (EEG) studies may be of interest since chronic peripheral current application to the vagus nerve may exert lasting neurophysiologically detectable effects on central electrical activity. In an exploratory study, we investigated the effects of VNS on auditory event-related potentials (ERP). METHODS: Thirteen depressive patients (mean Hamilton depression score (HAMD) at baseline=24.2) receiving VNS were investigated prior to implantation and 10 weeks after standard cycling VNS. Stimulation intensity was 0.94+/-0.46 mA, pulse width 0.250 mus, and frequency 20 Hz. 1 h prior to follow-up investigation, VNS was turned off. Auditory ERP were elicited using a standard auditory oddball paradigm and were recorded with 29-channel EEG. RESULTS: Post VNS, grand averages of the auditory ERP did not show significant differences as compared to baseline recording. However, differential effects were found when separating ERP of responders (N=5, mean HAMD post VNS=8.8) and non-responders (N=8, mean HAMD post VNS=22.4). In VNS responders only, P300 at midline electrodes Fz and Cz was significantly increased and correlated with HAMD scores. CONCLUSION: Auditory ERP seem to provide a useful tool for investigating VNS-induced changes concerning information processing in major depressive disorder. In our sample, enhancement of P300 distinguished VNS responders from non-responders 10 weeks after therapy onset. Our findings may be relevant for the understanding of both neurophysiological mechanism of action of VNS and pathophysiology of depression.
BACKGROUND: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a new therapy option for treatment of otherwise therapy-refractory major depressive disorder. However, the mechanism of central nervous action is poorly understood. Electroencephalographic (EEG) studies may be of interest since chronic peripheral current application to the vagus nerve may exert lasting neurophysiologically detectable effects on central electrical activity. In an exploratory study, we investigated the effects of VNS on auditory event-related potentials (ERP). METHODS: Thirteen depressivepatients (mean Hamilton depression score (HAMD) at baseline=24.2) receiving VNS were investigated prior to implantation and 10 weeks after standard cycling VNS. Stimulation intensity was 0.94+/-0.46 mA, pulse width 0.250 mus, and frequency 20 Hz. 1 h prior to follow-up investigation, VNS was turned off. Auditory ERP were elicited using a standard auditory oddball paradigm and were recorded with 29-channel EEG. RESULTS: Post VNS, grand averages of the auditory ERP did not show significant differences as compared to baseline recording. However, differential effects were found when separating ERP of responders (N=5, mean HAMD post VNS=8.8) and non-responders (N=8, mean HAMD post VNS=22.4). In VNS responders only, P300 at midline electrodes Fz and Cz was significantly increased and correlated with HAMD scores. CONCLUSION: Auditory ERP seem to provide a useful tool for investigating VNS-induced changes concerning information processing in major depressive disorder. In our sample, enhancement of P300 distinguished VNS responders from non-responders 10 weeks after therapy onset. Our findings may be relevant for the understanding of both neurophysiological mechanism of action of VNS and pathophysiology of depression.
Authors: Leen De Taeye; Kristl Vonck; Marlies van Bochove; Paul Boon; Dirk Van Roost; Lies Mollet; Alfred Meurs; Veerle De Herdt; Evelien Carrette; Ine Dauwe; Stefanie Gadeyne; Pieter van Mierlo; Tom Verguts; Robrecht Raedt Journal: Neurotherapeutics Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 7.620
Authors: Adam D Farmer; Adam Strzelczyk; Alessandra Finisguerra; Alexander V Gourine; Alireza Gharabaghi; Alkomiet Hasan; Andreas M Burger; Andrés M Jaramillo; Ann Mertens; Arshad Majid; Bart Verkuil; Bashar W Badran; Carlos Ventura-Bort; Charly Gaul; Christian Beste; Christopher M Warren; Daniel S Quintana; Dorothea Hämmerer; Elena Freri; Eleni Frangos; Eleonora Tobaldini; Eugenijus Kaniusas; Felix Rosenow; Fioravante Capone; Fivos Panetsos; Gareth L Ackland; Gaurav Kaithwas; Georgia H O'Leary; Hannah Genheimer; Heidi I L Jacobs; Ilse Van Diest; Jean Schoenen; Jessica Redgrave; Jiliang Fang; Jim Deuchars; Jozsef C Széles; Julian F Thayer; Kaushik More; Kristl Vonck; Laura Steenbergen; Lauro C Vianna; Lisa M McTeague; Mareike Ludwig; Maria G Veldhuizen; Marijke De Couck; Marina Casazza; Marius Keute; Marom Bikson; Marta Andreatta; Martina D'Agostini; Mathias Weymar; Matthew Betts; Matthias Prigge; Michael Kaess; Michael Roden; Michelle Thai; Nathaniel M Schuster; Nicola Montano; Niels Hansen; Nils B Kroemer; Peijing Rong; Rico Fischer; Robert H Howland; Roberta Sclocco; Roberta Sellaro; Ronald G Garcia; Sebastian Bauer; Sofiya Gancheva; Stavros Stavrakis; Stefan Kampusch; Susan A Deuchars; Sven Wehner; Sylvain Laborde; Taras Usichenko; Thomas Polak; Tino Zaehle; Uirassu Borges; Vanessa Teckentrup; Vera K Jandackova; Vitaly Napadow; Julian Koenig Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2021-03-23 Impact factor: 3.169