Literature DB >> 1709815

A maximum likelihood procedure for the analysis of group and individual data in aphasia research.

E Bates1, J McDonald, B MacWhinney, M Appelbaum.   

Abstract

The limitations inherent in group versus case studies appear to lie in a complementary distribution, underscoring the importance of combining both strategies within a single research program. However, this compromise approach requires analytic tools that permit us to combine and evaluate individual and group data in a common format. Maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) belongs to a family of procedures for determining goodness of fit. MLE can be used in conjunction with a linear or nonlinear model of the way that sources of information combine to determine a given behavioral outcome; such models can be used to estimate the distance between two groups, the degree to which an individual case deviates from a given empirically or theoretically defined group profile, and the degree to which one individual case resembles another. We offer a demonstration of how MLE can be used to evaluate group and individual profiles, in a cross-linguistic study of sentence comprehension in nonfluent aphasic speakers of English, Italian, and German. This includes a demonstration in which the MLE models for each language are "lesioned" to simulate several competing accounts of receptive agrammatism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1709815     DOI: 10.1016/0093-934x(91)90126-l

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  5 in total

1.  Can neuroimaging help aphasia researchers? Addressing generalizability, variability, and interpretability.

Authors:  Idan A Blank; Swathi Kiran; Evelina Fedorenko
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 2.  The changing relationship between anatomic and cognitive explanation in the neuropsychology of language.

Authors:  H Goodglass; A Wingfield
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1998-03

3.  Sentence processing in children with early unilateral brain injury.

Authors:  Heidi M Feldman; Brian MacWhinney; Kelley Sacco
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  Rational integration of noisy evidence and prior semantic expectations in sentence interpretation.

Authors:  Edward Gibson; Leon Bergen; Steven T Piantadosi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A psychometric analysis of functional category production in English agrammatic narratives.

Authors:  Lisa H Milman; Michael Walsh Dickey; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2008-02-05       Impact factor: 2.381

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.