Literature DB >> 17097967

True impact of the indication of cirrhosis and the MELD on the results of liver transplantation.

J Santoyo1, M A Suarez, J L Fernandez-Aguilar, J A Perez Daga, B Sanchez-Perez, C Ramirez, J M Aranda, A Rodríguez-Canete, A Gonzalez-Sanchez.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Our Aim was to determine the impact of cirrhosis and the preoperative MELD score on the immediate postoperative mortality and hospital stay as well as survival at 1, 5, and 8 years in liver transplantation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Transplanted cirrhotic patients were selected who did not display some of the main known risk factors affecting recipient. Donor and surgical technique were included in this analysis. These exclusion criteria for recipient factors were emergency transplants and retransplants; for donor factors, age over 60 years, ischemia time over 10 hours, and moderate or severe steatosis on back-bench biopsy; and for surgery, prior complex upper abdominal surgery (mainly derivative and gastroduodenal surgery). Among 340 total liver transplants including 16 retransplants performed from March 1997 to December 2005, 197 patients met the selection criteria. The mean age of the recipients was 52 years (17-67) and the donors, 39 years (11-60). The transplant indication was cirrhosis in all cases: HCV in 69 cases (35%); alcohol in 55 (28%); hepatocarcinoma in 38 (19%); HBV in 19 (10%); PBC in 8 (4%), and other etiologies in 8 cases (4%). The MELD scores were divided as group 1, <10 points (33 cases = 17%); group 2, 10 to 18 points (136 cases = 69%); and group 3, >18 points (28 cases = 14%). The statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 11.0.
RESULTS: Postoperative mortality (up to 3 months) was 16 cases (8%). The median ICU and hospital stays were 3 and 13.5 days, respectively. Overall survivals at 1, 5, and 8 years were 89%, 80%, and 77%, respectively. The survival for the same periods according to MELD group was 97%, 97%, and 97% for group 1; 87%, 76%, and 72% for group 2; and 85%, 81%, and 81% for group 3 (P = NS). The survival according to the three main indications at 1, 5, and 8 years was: HCV, 91%, 80%, and 80%; alcohol, 87%, 80%, and 71%; and hepatocarcinoma, 84%, 80%, and 80% (P = NS). No significant differences were observed among early deaths between MELD groups or transplant indications.
CONCLUSIONS: In a favorable liver transplant setting including acceptable donors, absence of prior complex abdominal surgery in the recipient, and nonemergency transplants, neither the cause of the cirrhosis nor its severity, as measured preoperatively by the MELD, were predictive of early postoperative death or long-term survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17097967     DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.08.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplant Proc        ISSN: 0041-1345            Impact factor:   1.066


  5 in total

1.  Impact of early reoperation on graft survival after liver transplantation: Univariate and multivariate analysis.

Authors:  Ahmed M Elsabbagh; Raffaele Girlanda; Jason Hawksworth; Matthew D Pichert; Cassie Williams; Agostino Pozzi; Alexander Kroemer; Anupama Nookala; Coleman Smith; Cal S Matsumoto; Thomas M Fishbein
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 2.863

2.  Model for end-stage liver disease versus the Child-Pugh score in predicting the post-transplant 3-month and 1-year mortality in a cohort of Chinese recipients.

Authors:  Zhiyong Guo; Xiaoshun He; Linwei Wu; Weiqiang Ju; Anbin Hu; Qiang Tai; Dongping Wang; Yi Ma; Guodong Wang; Xiaofeng Zhu; Jiefu Huang
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Model of end stage liver disease (MELD) score greater than 23 predicts length of stay in the ICU but not mortality in liver transplant recipients.

Authors:  Christian E Oberkofler; Philipp Dutkowski; Reto Stocker; Reto A Schuepbach; John F Stover; Pierre-Alain Clavien; Markus Béchir
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 9.097

4.  The relationship between lipid profile and severity of liver damage in cirrhotic patients.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Ghadir; Ali Akbar Riahin; Abbas Havaspour; Mehrdad Nooranipour; Abbas Ali Habibinejad
Journal:  Hepat Mon       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 0.660

5.  The combination of MELD score and ICG liver testing predicts length of stay in the ICU and hospital mortality in liver transplant recipients.

Authors:  Stephanie Klinzing; Giovanna Brandi; Paul A Stehberger; Dimitri A Raptis; Markus Béchir
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 2.217

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.