BACKGROUND:Severe atopic dermatitis (AD) often cannot be adequately controlled with topical agents. The continuous use of current systemic therapies for AD is limited by end-organ toxicities. A safe and effective systemic therapy for patients with recalcitrant AD is greatly needed. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential safety and efficacy of efalizumab, an inhibitor of T cell activation and migration, in adults with severe AD. METHODS: An investigator-initiated, prospective, open-label, pilot study was conducted involving ten subjects with severe AD. Subjects received an initial conditioning subcutaneous dose of efalizumab of 0.7 mg/kg followed by 1.0 mg/kg weekly for another 11 weeks for a total of 12 doses. The primary efficacy outcome was the change in the mean Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score from baseline as measured at week 12. Monitoring of adverse events continued for 8 weeks after discontinuation of therapy. RESULTS:EASI scores improved from a mean baseline score of 37.1 +/- 13.5 to 17.6 +/- 14.5 at week 12 (52.3% improvement; P < .0001). Six out of ten subjects reached at least a 50% improvement in EASI score by week 12. Pruritus levels decreased from 6.9 cm +/- 1.8 cm to 4.9 cm +/- 2.5 cm utilizing a visual analogue score (P < .015). Overall, efalizumab was well tolerated. There were three significant adverse events during the course of this study, including thrombocytopenia, viral gastroenteritis, and a subject with worsening of disease beyond baseline levels after drug discontinuation. LIMITATIONS: It is difficult to apply these findings to larger populations of patients with AD because this study lacked a control group and involved a small number of subjects with very severe disease. Long-term efficacy and safety of efalizumab in this population is not known. CONCLUSIONS:Efalizumab therapy resulted in significant clinical improvements in six of ten subjects with severe AD. Efalizumab may serve as a good alternative to current systemic immunosuppressants used for AD; however, double-blind placebo-controlled studies are needed to test its efficacy and safety.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Severe atopic dermatitis (AD) often cannot be adequately controlled with topical agents. The continuous use of current systemic therapies for AD is limited by end-organ toxicities. A safe and effective systemic therapy for patients with recalcitrant AD is greatly needed. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential safety and efficacy of efalizumab, an inhibitor of T cell activation and migration, in adults with severe AD. METHODS: An investigator-initiated, prospective, open-label, pilot study was conducted involving ten subjects with severe AD. Subjects received an initial conditioning subcutaneous dose of efalizumab of 0.7 mg/kg followed by 1.0 mg/kg weekly for another 11 weeks for a total of 12 doses. The primary efficacy outcome was the change in the mean Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score from baseline as measured at week 12. Monitoring of adverse events continued for 8 weeks after discontinuation of therapy. RESULTS: EASI scores improved from a mean baseline score of 37.1 +/- 13.5 to 17.6 +/- 14.5 at week 12 (52.3% improvement; P < .0001). Six out of ten subjects reached at least a 50% improvement in EASI score by week 12. Pruritus levels decreased from 6.9 cm +/- 1.8 cm to 4.9 cm +/- 2.5 cm utilizing a visual analogue score (P < .015). Overall, efalizumab was well tolerated. There were three significant adverse events during the course of this study, including thrombocytopenia, viral gastroenteritis, and a subject with worsening of disease beyond baseline levels after drug discontinuation. LIMITATIONS: It is difficult to apply these findings to larger populations of patients with AD because this study lacked a control group and involved a small number of subjects with very severe disease. Long-term efficacy and safety of efalizumab in this population is not known. CONCLUSIONS:Efalizumab therapy resulted in significant clinical improvements in six of ten subjects with severe AD. Efalizumab may serve as a good alternative to current systemic immunosuppressants used for AD; however, double-blind placebo-controlled studies are needed to test its efficacy and safety.
Authors: Andrea Montes-Torres; Mar Llamas-Velasco; Alejandra Pérez-Plaza; Guillermo Solano-López; Javier Sánchez-Pérez Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2015-04-03 Impact factor: 4.241