Literature DB >> 17096762

Long-term evaluation of cyclosporine and tacrolimus based immunosuppression in pediatric liver transplantation.

Wibke Hasenbein1, Johannes Albani, Cornelia Englert, Aranke Spehr, Enke Grabhorn, Markus J Kemper, Martin Burdelski, Rainer Ganschow.   

Abstract

Both calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), cyclosporine and tacrolimus, are widely used in pediatric liver transplant recipients and currently data are limited with regards to long-term results using the one drug or the other in comparable low doses. We conducted the present study to assess the advantages and disadvantages of both drugs in children at least five yr post-liver transplantation. A total of 129 children were enrolled in the study. Thirty-eight of the children were switched to tacrolimus monotherapy for different reasons [steroid resistant graft rejection (n = 15), chronic rejection (n = 5), severe acute rejection (n = 4), repetitive acute graft rejection (n = 5), dysfunction of the transplant (n = 3), insufficient CsA metabolism (n = 3), hypertrichosis (n = 2), and CsA toxicity (n = 1)], four patients had primary tacrolimus therapy, and 87 patients are receiving cyclosporine. Mean trough levels were 5.3 +/- 2.3 ng/mL (tacrolimus) and 73.6 +/- 44.5 micro/L (cyclosporine), respectively at least five yr post-orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). There was no significant difference in the calculated glomerular filtration rate between children on cyclosporine and tacrolimus (142.7 + 39.5 mL/min/1.73 m(2) vs. 151.1 +/- 44.1 mL/min/1.73 m(2)). The incidence of arterial hypertension was 7.1% vs. 9.2%, that of hepatotoxicity was 0% vs. 2.3%. Cosmetic changes were found in more than one-third of the patients on cyclosporine and in 4.8% of the patients receiving tacrolimus. Quality of life was excellent in both groups (self assessment). The impact of CNIs on chronic graft dysfunction cannot be assessed by our present study. We conclude from the results that cyclosporine and tacrolimus are both excellent drugs for maintenance immunosuppression in the long-term course following pediatric liver transplantation. However, this retrospective analysis is limited by the bias between children on CsA as compared with patients receiving tacrolimus. A prospective randomized controlled trial is needed in order to assess which CNI is the best for children following OLT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17096762     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2006.00580.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Transplant        ISSN: 1397-3142


  5 in total

Review 1.  Posttransplant metabolic syndrome in children and adolescents after liver transplantation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Emily Rothbaum Perito; Audrey Lau; Sue Rhee; John P Roberts; Philip Rosenthal
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.799

Review 2.  Diagnosis, pathogenesis, and treatment of autoimmune hepatitis after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Albert J Czaja
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-05-06       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Cosmetically disfiguring side effects of cyclosporine.

Authors:  Vinitha Varghese Panicker; Anil Mathew; Ad Dhamramaratnam
Journal:  Int J Trichology       Date:  2012-01

Review 4.  Myoblast transplantation: a possible surgical treatment for a severe pediatric disease.

Authors:  Beniamino Palmieri; Jacques P Tremblay
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Long-term Follow-up of a Randomized Trial of Tacrolimus or Cyclosporine A Microemulsion in Children Post Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Carla Lloyd; Adam Arshad; Paloma Jara; Martin Burdelski; Bruno Gridelli; J Manzanares; Michele Colledan; Emmanuel Jacquemin; Raymond Reding; Ulrich Baumann; Deirdre Kelly
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2021-09-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.