Literature DB >> 17096452

The initial development of an item bank to assess and screen for psychological distress in cancer patients.

A B Smith1, R Rush, G Velikova, L Wall, E P Wright, D Stark, P Selby, M Sharpe.   

Abstract

Psychological distress is a common problem among cancer patients. Despite the large number of instruments that have been developed to assess distress, their utility remains disappointing. This study aimed to use Rasch models to develop an item-bank which would provide the basis for better means of assessing psychological distress in cancer patients.An item bank was developed from eight psychological distress questionnaires using Rasch analysis to link common items. Items from the questionnaires were added iteratively with common items as anchor points and misfitting items (infit mean square >1.3) removed, and unidimensionality assessed.A total of 4914 patients completed the questionnaires providing an initial pool of 83 items. Twenty items were removed resulting in a final pool of 63 items. Good fit was demonstrated and no additional factor structure was evident from the residuals. However, there was little overlap between item locations and person measures, since items mainly targeted higher levels of distress. The Rasch analysis allowed items to be pooled and generated a unidimensional instrument for measuring psychological distress in cancer patients. Additional items are required to more accurately assess patients across the whole continuum of psychological distress. Copyright (c) 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17096452     DOI: 10.1002/pon.1117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  3 in total

1.  Enhancing patient-reported outcome measurement in research and practice of palliative and end-of-life care.

Authors:  Steffen T Simon; Irene J Higginson; Richard Harding; Barbara A Daveson; Marjolein Gysels; Luc Deliens; Michael A Echteld; Lukas Radbruch; Franco Toscani; Dominik M Krzyzanowski; Massimo Costantini; Julia Downing; Pedro L Ferreira; Abdelhamid Benalia; Claudia Bausewein
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Rasch fit statistics and sample size considerations for polytomous data.

Authors:  Adam B Smith; Robert Rush; Lesley J Fallowfield; Galina Velikova; Michael Sharpe
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 4.615

3.  The EORTC emotional functioning computerized adaptive test: phases I-III of a cross-cultural item bank development.

Authors:  Eva-Maria Gamper; Mogens Groenvold; Morten Aa Petersen; Teresa Young; Anna Costantini; Neil Aaronson; Johannes M Giesinger; Verena Meraner; Georg Kemmler; Bernhard Holzner
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 3.894

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.