Literature DB >> 17096257

Biomechanics of 4-point seat belt systems in frontal impacts.

Stephen W Rouhana1, Paul G Bedewi, Sundeep V Kankanala, Priya Prasad, Joseph J Zwolinski, Alex G Meduvsky, Jonathan D Rupp, Thomas A Jeffreys, Lawrence W Schneider.   

Abstract

The biomechanical behavior of 4-point seat belt systems was investigated through MADYMO modeling, dummy tests and post mortem human subject tests. This study was conducted to assess the effect of 4-point seat belts on the risk of thoracic injury in frontal impacts, to evaluate the ability to prevent submarining under the lap belt using 4-point seat belts, and to examine whether 4-point belts may induce injuries not typically observed with 3-point seat belts. The performance of two types of 4-point seat belts was compared with that of a pretensioned, load-limited, 3-point seat belt. A 3-point belt with an extra shoulder belt that "crisscrossed" the chest (X4) appeared to add constraint to the torso and increased chest deflection and injury risk. Harness style shoulder belts (V4) loaded the body in a different biomechanical manner than 3-point and X4 belts. The V4 belt appeared to shift load to the clavicles and pelvis and to reduce traction of the shoulder belt across the chest, resulting in a reduction in chest deflection by a factor of two. This is associated with a 5 to 500-fold reduction in thoracic injury risk, depending on whether one assumes 4-point belts apply concentrated or distributed load. In four of six post mortem human subjects restrained by V4 belts during 40 km/h sled tests, chest compression was zero or negative and rib fractures were nearly eliminated. Submarining was not observed in any test with post mortem human subjects. Though lumbar, sacral and pelvic injuries were noted, they are believed to be due to the artificial restraint environment (no knee bolsters, instrument panels, steering systems or airbags). While they show significant potential to reduce thoracic injury risk, there are still many issues to be resolved before 4-point belts can be considered for production vehicles. These issues include, among others, potential effects on hard and soft neck tissues, of interaction with inboard shoulder belts in farside impacts and potential effects on the fetus of latch/buckle junctions at the centerline of pregnant occupants. Work continues at Ford Motor Company to resolve these issues.

Entities:  

Year:  2003        PMID: 17096257     DOI: 10.4271/2003-22-0017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stapp Car Crash J        ISSN: 1532-8546


  7 in total

1.  Risk and injury severity of obese child passengers in motor vehicle crashes.

Authors:  Jong-Eun Kim; Min-Heng Hsieh; Phillip C Shum; R Shane Tubbs; David B Allison
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 5.002

2.  Integrating engineering principles into the medico-legal investigation of a rare fatal rollover car accident involving complex dynamics.

Authors:  Vincenzo M Grassi; Flaminia Castagnola; Massimo Miscusi; Fabio De-Giorgio
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 2.007

3.  How many people are injured and killed as a result of aging? Frailty, fragility, and the elderly risk-exposure tradeoff assessed via a risk saturation model.

Authors:  Richard Kent; Matthew Trowbridge; Francisco J Lopez-Valdes; Rafael Heredero Ordoyo; Maria Segui-Gomez
Journal:  Ann Adv Automot Med       Date:  2009-10

4.  BMI and risk of serious upper body injury following motor vehicle crashes: concordance of real-world and computer-simulated observations.

Authors:  Shankuan Zhu; Jong-Eun Kim; Xiaoguang Ma; Alan Shih; Purushottam W Laud; Frank Pintar; Wei Shen; Steven B Heymsfield; David B Allison
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 11.069

5.  A computational study of injury severity and pattern sustained by overweight drivers in frontal motor vehicle crashes.

Authors:  Jong-Eun Kim; Il Hwan Kim; Phillip C Shum; Alan M Shih; Frank Pintar; Wei Shen; Xiaoguang Ma; Purushottam W Laud; Steven B Heymsfield; David B Allison; Shankuan Zhu
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 1.763

6.  Injury reduction opportunities of far side impact countermeasures.

Authors:  Ola Bostrom; Hampton C Gabler; Kennerly Digges; Brian Fildes; Cecilia Sunnevang
Journal:  Ann Adv Automot Med       Date:  2008-10

7.  Simultaneous Three-Dimensional Analysis of Cervical Spine Kinematics in the Axial and Sagittal Views during a Simulated Frontal Impact: Differences between Tensed and Relaxed States.

Authors:  Keita Nakayama; Masataka Sakane; Susumu Ejima; Daisuke Ito; Tomofumi Nishino; Sou Kitajima; Masashi Yamazaki
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2015-12-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.