PURPOSE: Cell-based therapy by transplantation of progenitor cells has emerged as a promising development for organ repair, but non-invasive imaging approaches are required to monitor the fate of transplanted cells. Radioactive labelling with (111)In-oxine has been used in preclinical trials. This study aimed to validate (111)In-oxine labelling and subsequent in vivo and ex vivo detection of haematopoietic progenitor cells. METHODS: Murine haematopoietic progenitor cells (10(6), FDCPmix) were labelled with 0.1 MBq (low dose) or 1.0 MBq (high dose) (111)In-oxine and compared with unlabelled controls. Cellular retention of (111)In, viability and proliferation were determined up to 48 h after labelling. Labelled cells were injected into the cavity of the left or right cardiac ventricle in mice. Scintigraphic images were acquired 24 h later. Organ samples were harvested to determine the tissue-specific activity. RESULTS: Labelling efficiency was 75 +/- 14%. Cellular retention of incorporated (111)In after 48 h was 18 +/- 4%. Percentage viability after 48 h was 90 +/- 1% (control), 58 +/- 7% (low dose) and 48 +/- 8% (high dose) (p<0.0001). Numbers of viable cells after 48 h (normalised to 0 h) were 249 +/- 51% (control), 42 +/- 8% (low dose) and 32 +/- 5% (high dose) (p<0.0001). Cells accumulated in the spleen (86.6 +/- 27.0% ID/g), bone marrow (59.1 +/- 16.1% ID/g) and liver (30.3 +/- 9.5% ID/g) after left ventricular injection, whereas most of the cells were detected in the lungs (42.4 +/- 21.8% ID/g) after right ventricular injection. CONCLUSION: Radiolabelling of haematopoietic progenitor cells with (111)In-oxine is feasible, with high labelling efficiency but restricted stability. The integrity of labelled cells is significantly affected, with substantially reduced viability and proliferation and limited migration after systemic transfusion.
PURPOSE: Cell-based therapy by transplantation of progenitor cells has emerged as a promising development for organ repair, but non-invasive imaging approaches are required to monitor the fate of transplanted cells. Radioactive labelling with (111)In-oxine has been used in preclinical trials. This study aimed to validate (111)In-oxine labelling and subsequent in vivo and ex vivo detection of haematopoietic progenitor cells. METHODS:Murine haematopoietic progenitor cells (10(6), FDCPmix) were labelled with 0.1 MBq (low dose) or 1.0 MBq (high dose) (111)In-oxine and compared with unlabelled controls. Cellular retention of (111)In, viability and proliferation were determined up to 48 h after labelling. Labelled cells were injected into the cavity of the left or right cardiac ventricle in mice. Scintigraphic images were acquired 24 h later. Organ samples were harvested to determine the tissue-specific activity. RESULTS:Labelling efficiency was 75 +/- 14%. Cellular retention of incorporated (111)In after 48 h was 18 +/- 4%. Percentage viability after 48 h was 90 +/- 1% (control), 58 +/- 7% (low dose) and 48 +/- 8% (high dose) (p<0.0001). Numbers of viable cells after 48 h (normalised to 0 h) were 249 +/- 51% (control), 42 +/- 8% (low dose) and 32 +/- 5% (high dose) (p<0.0001). Cells accumulated in the spleen (86.6 +/- 27.0% ID/g), bone marrow (59.1 +/- 16.1% ID/g) and liver (30.3 +/- 9.5% ID/g) after left ventricular injection, whereas most of the cells were detected in the lungs (42.4 +/- 21.8% ID/g) after right ventricular injection. CONCLUSION: Radiolabelling of haematopoietic progenitor cells with (111)In-oxine is feasible, with high labelling efficiency but restricted stability. The integrity of labelled cells is significantly affected, with substantially reduced viability and proliferation and limited migration after systemic transfusion.
Authors: R E Bittner; C Schöfer; K Weipoltshammer; S Ivanova; B Streubel; E Hauser; M Freilinger; H Höger; A Elbe-Bürger; F Wachtler Journal: Anat Embryol (Berl) Date: 1999-05
Authors: Michael Hofmann; Kai C Wollert; Gerd P Meyer; Alix Menke; Lubomir Arseniev; Bernd Hertenstein; Arnold Ganser; Wolfram H Knapp; Helmut Drexler Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-04-25 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Rong Zhou; Daniel H Thomas; Hui Qiao; Harshali S Bal; Seok-Rye Choi; Abass Alavi; Victor A Ferrari; Hank F Kung; Paul D Acton Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Franz Josef Gildehaus; Florian Haasters; Inga Drosse; Erika Wagner; Christian Zach; Wolf Mutschler; Paul Cumming; Peter Bartenstein; Matthias Schieker Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Matthew C L Keith; Yukichi Tokita; Xian-Liang Tang; Shahab Ghafghazi; Joseph B Moore; Kyung U Hong; Julius B Elmore; Alok R Amraotkar; Haixun Guo; Brian L Ganzel; Kendra J Grubb; Michael P Flaherty; Bathri N Vajravelu; Marcin Wysoczynski; Roberto Bolli Journal: Basic Res Cardiol Date: 2015-07-07 Impact factor: 17.165
Authors: Jean-Philippe Hauzeur; Claire Bernard; Dominique Egrise; William Kurth; Henry Van Cauwenberge; Chantal Lechanteur; Philippe Gillet; Yves Beguin; Michel Malaise; Roland Hustinx Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2012-11-25 Impact factor: 3.075