Literature DB >> 17094780

The influence of CYP2D6 phenotype on the clinical response of nebivolol in patients with essential hypertension.

Jean Lefebvre1, Luc Poirier, Paul Poirier, Jacques Turgeon, Yves Lacourciere.   

Abstract

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: * The variability in drug metabolism has been recognized as an important factor in the occurrence of adverse effects or lack of therapeutic efficacy. * The metabolism of the third-generation beta(1)-receptor antagonist nebivolol has been shown to be highly dependent on cytochrome P450 2D6 enzymatic activity in preclinical studies. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: * This paper assesses the role of a cytochrome P450 2D6 gene defect on the antihypertensive response to nebivolol in a clinical setting. * Despite significant differences in drug disposition, the chronic administration of nebivolol produced similar efficacy and tolerability in hypertensive patients either characterized as poor or extensive metabolizers of the drug. * The study offers insight into the relative contribution of nebivolol enantiomers in systemic blood pressure control. AIMS: Nebivolol is a beta(1)-adrenergic receptor antagonist with vasodilating properties used in the treatment of hypertension. It is administered as a racemic mixture (D- and L-nebivolol) and is highly metabolized by the cytochrome P-450 2D6 (CYP2D6). The purpose of this study was to determine the role of CYP2D6 phenotypes on the efficacy and tolerability of nebivolol during chronic administration to patients with essential hypertension.
METHODS: Two hundred and eighteen patients were genotyped and phenotyped for CYP2D6 activity, allowing to find and match 14 poor metabolizers (PMs) with 23 extensive metabolizers (EMs). Patients took rac-nebivolol 5 mg daily for 12 weeks. Blood pressure (BP), heart rate, adverse events, plasma levels of the two enantiomers D- and L-nebivolol and their corresponding hydroxymetabolites were assessed.
RESULTS: The metabolic disposition of nebivolol was enantioselective and highly influenced by CYP2D6 phenotypes. Mean steady-state plasma concentrations of D- and L-nebivolol were 10- and 15-fold greater in PMs than in EMs, respectively (P < 0.0001). Despite these differences in the pharmacokinetics of nebivolol, EMs and PMs displayed similar BP responses. Mean reductions in sitting systolic and diastolic BPs were -11/-10 +/- 9/4 mmHg in EMs and -11/-9 +/- 10/5 mmHg in PMs. Side-effects were mild to moderate and not different between groups.
CONCLUSION: Polymorphisms in the gene encoding CYP2D6 significantly influenced the metabolism of nebivolol, but not its antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability. The similar clinical response between EMs and PMs could be explained by the contribution of active hydroxylated metabolites of nebivolol to its antihypertensive actions in EMs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17094780      PMCID: PMC2000751          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2006.02796.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  26 in total

Review 1.  Effects of antihypertensive drugs on endothelial dysfunction: clinical implications.

Authors:  Stefano Taddei; Agostino Virdis; Lorenzo Ghiadoni; Isabella Sudano; Antonio Salvetti
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Improving safety reporting from randomised trials.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis; Joseph Lau
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Nebivolol: a third-generation beta-blocker that augments vascular nitric oxide release: endothelial beta(2)-adrenergic receptor-mediated nitric oxide production.

Authors:  M A Broeders; P A Doevendans; B C Bekkers; R Bronsaer; E van Gorsel; J W Heemskerk; M G Egbrink; E van Breda; R S Reneman; R van Der Zee
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-08-08       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  Principles of signal detection in pharmacovigilance.

Authors:  R H Meyboom; A C Egberts; I R Edwards; Y A Hekster; F H de Koning; F W Gribnau
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  Nebivolol reverses endothelial dysfunction in essential hypertension: a randomized, double-blind, crossover study.

Authors:  N Tzemos; P O Lim; T M MacDonald
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-07-31       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  A single and multiple dose pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic comparison of conventional and slow-release metroprolol.

Authors:  M J Kendall; V A John; C P Quarterman; P G Welling
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Increased frequency of cytochrome P450 2D6 poor metabolizers among patients with metoprolol-associated adverse effects.

Authors:  Henrike Wuttke; Thomas Rau; Roland Heide; Klaus Bergmann; Michael Böhm; Joachim Weil; Dierk Werner; Thomas Eschenhagen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.875

8.  Nebivolol in hypertension: a double-blind placebo-controlled multicenter study assessing its antihypertensive efficacy and impact on quality of life.

Authors:  L M Van Bortel; J G Breed; J Joosten; J A Kragten; F A Lustermans; J M Mooij
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.105

Review 9.  Nebivolol: a review.

Authors:  John Cockcroft
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.889

Review 10.  Cytochrome P450 2D6: overview and update on pharmacology, genetics, biochemistry.

Authors:  Ulrich M Zanger; Sebastian Raimundo; Michel Eichelbaum
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 3.000

View more
  13 in total

1.  Influence of chronic kidney disease and haemodialysis treatment on pharmacokinetics of nebivolol enantiomers.

Authors:  Daniel V Neves; Vera L Lanchote; Miguel Moysés Neto; José A Cardeal da Costa; Carolina P Vieira; Eduardo B Coelho
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Impact of obesity on drug metabolism and elimination in adults and children.

Authors:  Margreke J E Brill; Jeroen Diepstraten; Anne van Rongen; Simone van Kralingen; John N van den Anker; Catherijne A J Knibbe
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Effect of nebivolol on beat-to-beat and short-term blood pressure variability in spontaneously hypertensive rats.

Authors:  Facundo Martín Bertera; Julieta Sofía Del Mauro; Ariel Héctor Polizio; Diego Chiappetta; Carlos Alberto Taira; Christian Höcht
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 4.  Postpartum Cardiomyopathy and Considerations for Breastfeeding.

Authors:  Laura Kearney; Paul Wright; Sadeer Fhadil; Martin Thomas
Journal:  Card Fail Rev       Date:  2018-08

5.  A simplified mechanistic algorithm for treating resistant hypertension: efficacy in a retrospective study.

Authors:  Samuel J Mann; Neal S Parikh
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 6.  Pharmacogenetics to guide cardiovascular drug therapy.

Authors:  Julio D Duarte; Larisa H Cavallari
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 7.  Pharmacogenetic factors affecting β-blocker metabolism and response.

Authors:  Cameron D Thomas; Julie A Johnson
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 4.481

8.  Impact of CYP2D6 polymorphisms on clinical efficacy and tolerability of metoprolol tartrate.

Authors:  I S Hamadeh; T Y Langaee; R Dwivedi; S Garcia; B M Burkley; T C Skaar; A B Chapman; J G Gums; S T Turner; Y Gong; R M Cooper-DeHoff; J A Johnson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 9.  Nebivolol in the treatment of chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Angie Veverka; Jennifer L Salinas
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2007

10.  Phenotypic differences in nebivolol metabolism and bioavailability in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Corina Briciu; Maria Neag; Dana Muntean; Corina Bocsan; Anca Buzoianu; Oana Antonescu; Ana-Maria Gheldiu; Marcela Achim; Adina Popa; Laurian Vlase
Journal:  Clujul Med       Date:  2015-04-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.