Literature DB >> 17094649

The differing views on insanity of two nineteenth century forensic psychiatrists.

Allen D Spiegel, Florence Kavaler.   

Abstract

Dr. Charles H. Nichols and Dr. John P. Gray were the two foremost forensic psychiatrists in the latter half of the nineteenth century in the U.S. However, their rationales differed dramatically. They were involved in four notable murder trials where insanity issues arose: one was a trial for the murderer of a Union officer during the Civil War; in another, a conspirator was tried for the assassination of President Abraham Lincoln; in the third, a temporary insanity plea was supported by a medical expert for the first time in a U.S. courtroom; and the fourth was the trial of the assassin of President James A. Garfield. Pointedly, their differing viewpoints still remain controversial today.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17094649     DOI: 10.1007/s10900-006-9017-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Health        ISSN: 0094-5145


  5 in total

1.  Insanity as the loss of self: the moral insanity controversy revisited.

Authors:  S P Fullinwider
Journal:  Bull Hist Med       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 1.314

2.  Dr. JOHN P. GRAY and the Guiteau case.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1955-03       Impact factor: 18.112

3.  Moral insanity in the United States 1835-1866.

Authors:  N DAIN; E T CARLSON
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1962-03       Impact factor: 18.112

4.  The use of the insanity defense as a jail diversion mechanism for mentally ill persons charged with misdemeanors.

Authors:  Michele N Schaefer; Joseph D Bloom
Journal:  J Am Acad Psychiatry Law       Date:  2005

5.  Sleep of reason: John P. Gray and the challenge of moral insanity.

Authors:  R J Waldinger
Journal:  J Hist Med Allied Sci       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 2.088

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.