Literature DB >> 17094382

Study participation improves treatment strategies and individual patient care in participating centers.

W Janni1, M Kiechle, H Sommer, B Rack, K Gauger, M Heinrigs, D Steinfeld, D Augustin, W Simon, N Harbeck, K Friese.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ADEBAR study is a prospective multicenter Phase III trial to examine whether high-risk breast cancer patients > or =4 involved axillary lymph nodes) benefit from a sequential anthracycline-docetaxel regimen compared to standard chemotherapy with anthracyclines. With a median recruitment of 33 patients per month at 198 actively-recruiting centers, the ADEBAR study was the best recruiting study in Germany until the end of the trial.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A standardized questionnaire was sent to all participating centers in order to determine the extent to which treatment strategies and patient care are affected by participation in the ADEBAR study. The questionnaire covered 5 areas of interest: previous inclusion of patients at the same tumor stage in other studies, the type of chemotherapy received by comparable patients previously outside the study, change in the intensity of medical care since participating in the ADEBAR study, the information gained through participation in the study and changes in the overall quality of medical care.
RESULTS: 51.0% (n=98) of the questionnaires were returned, from which 3 were excluded from the analysis due to being incomplete. In the year preceding the ADEBAR study, 63.2% of participating centers had not entered their high-risk patients into a clinical trial. Before participating in the ADEBAR protocol, 44.2% of patients with the same indication had received inadequate therapy by today's standards, such as CMF, EC/CMF or 4x EC. 59.0% of the centers noted an increase in the intensity of patient care as a result of participation in the study, independent of the care provided purely because of the study. By being part of a research network, with a regular flow of information via newsletters, study meetings and the like, 80.0% noted an improvement in their professional knowledge in the field of breast cancer. Moreover, 31.6% of the centers reported an improvement in the overall quality of their patient care since the start of the trial.
CONCLUSION: The results of the survey demonstrate that both physicians and patients benefit from participation in clinical trials as this is associated with optimized decision-making as regards therapy and patient care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17094382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Res        ISSN: 0250-7005            Impact factor:   2.480


  8 in total

Review 1.  Clinical research methodology I: introduction to randomized trials.

Authors:  Lillian S Kao; Jon E Tyson; Martin L Blakely; Kevin P Lally
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Ethical challenges involved in obtaining consent for research from patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Fiona Ecarnot; Jean-Pierre Quenot; Guillaume Besch; Gaël Piton
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-12

3.  The relationship between clinical trial accrual volume and outcomes in acute myeloid leukemia: A SWOG/ECOG-ACRIN study (S0106 and E1900).

Authors:  Bruno C Medeiros; Megan Othus; Martin S Tallman; Zhuoxin Sun; Hugo F Fernandez; Jacob M Rowe; Hillard M Lazarus; Frederick R Appelbaum; Selina M Luger; Mark R Litzow; Harry P Erba
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 3.156

4.  Participation in the SUCCESS-A Trial Improves Intensity and Quality of Care for Patients with Primary Breast Cancer.

Authors:  U Andergassen; N S Kasprowicz; P Hepp; C Schindlbeck; N Harbeck; M Kiechle; H Sommer; M W Beckmann; K Friese; W Janni; B Rack; C Scholz
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 5.  Effects on patients of their healthcare practitioner's or institution's participation in clinical trials: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mike Clarke; Kirsty Loudon
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Improving the recruitment activity of clinicians in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ben Fletcher; Adrian Gheorghe; David Moore; Sue Wilson; Sarah Damery
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Future of translational research: Why go pragmatic?

Authors:  Abdul Rahman Jazieh
Journal:  Pragmat Obs Res       Date:  2011-02-07

8.  Quality of life of locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients after FOLFIRINOX treatment.

Authors:  Fleur van der Sijde; Laura Schafthuizen; Freek R van 't Land; Miranda Moskie; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Monique van Dijk; Casper H J van Eijck
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 3.603

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.