Literature DB >> 17093240

Placentomal differentiation may compensate for maternal nutrient restriction in ewes adapted to harsh range conditions.

K A Vonnahme1, B W Hess, M J Nijland, P W Nathanielsz, S P Ford.   

Abstract

Maternal nutrient restriction from early to midgestation can lead to fetal growth retardation, with long-term impacts on offspring growth, physiology, and metabolism. We hypothesized that ewes from flocks managed under markedly different environmental conditions and levels of nutrition might differ in their ability to protect their own fetus from a bout of maternal nutrient restriction. We utilized multiparous ewes of similar breeding, age, and parity from 2 flocks managed as 1) ewes adapted to a nomadic existence and year-long, limited nutrition near Baggs, WY (Baggs ewes), and 2) University of Wyoming ewes with a sedentary lifestyle and continuous provision of more than adequate nutrition (UW ewes). Groups of Baggs ewes and UW ewes were fed 50 (nutrient restricted) or 100% (control fed) of National Research Council recommendations from d 28 to 78 of gestation, then necropsied, and fetal and placental data were obtained. Although there was a marked decrease (P < 0.05) in fetal weight and blood glucose concentrations in nutrient-restricted vs. control fed UW ewes, there was no difference in these fetal measurements between nutrient-restricted and control-fed Baggs ewes. Nutrient-restricted and control-fed UW ewes exhibited predominantly type A placentomes on d 78, but there were fewer (P c0.05) type A and greater (P < 0.05) numbers of type B, C, and D placentomes in nutrient-restricted than control-fed Baggs ewes. Placental efficiency (fetal weight/placentomal weight) was reduced (P = 0.04) in d 78 nutrient-restricted UW ewes when compared with control-fed UW ewes. In contrast, nutrient-restricted and control-fed Baggs ewes exhibited similar placental efficiencies on d 78. This is the first report of different placental responses to a nutritional challenge during pregnancy when ewes were selected under different management systems. These data are consistent with the concept that Baggs ewes or their conceptuses, which were adapted to both harsh environments and limited nutrition, initiated conversion of type A placentomes to other placentomal types when subjected to an early to mid-gestational nutrient restriction, whereas this conversion failed to occur in UW ewes. This early placentomal conversion in the Baggs ewes may function to maintain normal nutrient delivery to their developing fetuses during maternal nutrient restriction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17093240     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2006-132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  19 in total

1.  Importance of genetic differences in developmental programming: gene by environment interactions in models of maternal dietary restriction.

Authors:  Laura A Cox; Peter W Nathanielsz
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-03-22       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 2.  Placental efficiency and adaptation: endocrine regulation.

Authors:  A L Fowden; A N Sferruzzi-Perri; P M Coan; M Constancia; G J Burton
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 3.  Baboons as a model to study genetics and epigenetics of human disease.

Authors:  Laura A Cox; Anthony G Comuzzie; Lorena M Havill; Genesio M Karere; Kimberly D Spradling; Michael C Mahaney; Peter W Nathanielsz; Daniel P Nicolella; Robert E Shade; Saroja Voruganti; John L VandeBerg
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2013

Review 4.  BEEF SPECIES-RUMINANT NUTRITION CACTUS BEEF SYMPOSIUM: Sustainable and economically viable management options for cow/calf production through enhanced beef cow metabolic efficiency1.

Authors:  J Travis Mulliniks; Joslyn K Beard
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Maternal undernutrition during the pre- and post-conception periods in twin-bearing hairsheep ewes: effects on fetal and placental development at mid-gestation.

Authors:  Ulises Macías-Cruz; Ricardo Vicente-Pérez; Miguel Mellado; Abelardo Correa-Calderón; Cesar A Meza-Herrera; Leonel Avendaño-Reyes
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 1.559

6.  Developmental programing: impact of testosterone on placental differentiation.

Authors:  E M Beckett; O Astapova; T L Steckler; A Veiga-Lopez; V Padmanabhan
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 3.906

7.  Ergot alkaloid exposure during gestation alters. I. Maternal characteristics and placental development of pregnant ewes1.

Authors:  Jessica L Britt; Maslyn A Greene; William C Bridges; James L Klotz; Glen E Aiken; John G Andrae; Scott L Pratt; Nathan M Long; F N Schrick; James R Strickland; Sarah A Wilbanks; Markus F Miller; Brandon M Koch; Susan K Duckett
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Developmental programming: prenatal BPA treatment disrupts timing of LH surge and ovarian follicular wave dynamics in adult sheep.

Authors:  A Veiga-Lopez; E M Beckett; B Abi Salloum; W Ye; V Padmanabhan
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 4.219

9.  Rapid Communication: Maternal melatonin implants improve fetal oxygen supply and body weight at term in sheep pregnancies.

Authors:  Francisco Sales; Oscar A Peralta; Eileen Narbona; Sue McCoard; Antonio González-Bulnes; Victor H Parraguez
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 10.  From Mice to Men: research models of developmental programming.

Authors:  C Rabadán-Diehl; P Nathanielsz
Journal:  J Dev Orig Health Dis       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.401

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.