Literature DB >> 17093234

Feeding time and feeding rate and its relationship with feed intake, feed efficiency, growth rate, and rate of fat deposition in growing Duroc barrows.

W M Rauw1, J Soler, J Tibau, J Reixach, L Gomez Raya.   

Abstract

Because feed is the major cost to pork production, management practices and breeding strategies are aimed at optimizing feed intake. Knowledge about the shape of feed intake and feeding behavior curves may be of interest for optimization of lean meat production. This study investigated trends based on daily measurements of feeding behavior in 200 Duroc barrows, originating from 5 sires and 200 dams, during growth. Daily values were examined between 88 and 188 d of age. Furthermore, phenotypic correlations between feeding length and feeding rate, and feeding frequency, feed intake, residual feed intake, growth rate, and rate of fat deposition were investigated for a period between 95 and 175 d of age. No differences were observed between sires for parameter estimates of a curvilinear function fitted to data on feeding length as a function of age, but the effect of sire was significant (P < 0.01) for values at individual ages up to 132 d of age. Feeding rate (feed ingested for each minute spent eating) increased in a linear fashion with age (average R(2) = 0.80) and differently so for different sires (P < 0.05 for the intercept and P < 0.01 for the regression coefficient). Because the increase in BW is linear over this time period (average R(2) = 0.99), the results suggest that feeding rate increased with increased BW and is related to the physical capacity for feed intake. Results indicate that pigs that ate faster also ate more (r = 0.29, P < 0.001), grew faster (r = 0.40, P < 0.001), and grew fatter (r = 0.28, P < 0.001), but had no greater or lower residual feed intake (r = -0.01). The linear regression slope of feeding rate on age seemed inherent to the individual and was correlated with feed intake but not with residual feed intake. Feeding length may be selected for in order to regulate absolute feed intake at different stages of growth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17093234     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2006-209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  12 in total

1.  Use of Host Feeding Behavior and Gut Microbiome Data in Estimating Variance Components and Predicting Growth and Body Composition Traits in Swine.

Authors:  Yuqing He; Francesco Tiezzi; Jicai Jiang; Jeremy T Howard; Yijian Huang; Kent Gray; Jung-Woo Choi; Christian Maltecca
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 4.141

2.  Genome-wide association analysis reveals genetic loci and candidate genes for feeding behavior and eating efficiency in Duroc boars.

Authors:  Rongrong Ding; Jianping Quan; Ming Yang; Xingwang Wang; Enqin Zheng; Huaqiang Yang; Disheng Fu; Yang Yang; Linxue Yang; Zicong Li; Dewu Liu; Gengyuan Cai; Zhenfang Wu; Jie Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  The influence of feeding behaviour on growth performance, carcass and meat characteristics of growing pigs.

Authors:  Giuseppe Carcò; Luigi Gallo; Mirco Dalla Bona; Maria Angeles Latorre; Manuel Fondevila; Stefano Schiavon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Strategies to improve the growth and homogeneity of growing-finishing pigs: feeder space and feeding management.

Authors:  Sergi López-Vergé; Josep Gasa; Déborah Temple; Jordi Bonet; Jaume Coma; David Solà-Oriol
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2018-07-02

5.  Exploring the role of gut microbiota in host feeding behavior among breeds in swine.

Authors:  Yuqing He; Francesco Tiezzi; Jeremy Howard; Yijian Huang; Kent Gray; Christian Maltecca
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 3.605

6.  Plasticity of feeding behaviour traits in response to production environment (temperate vs. tropical) in group-housed growing pigs.

Authors:  Nausicaa Poullet; Wendy M Rauw; David Renaudeau; Juliette Riquet; Mario Giorgi; Yvon Billon; Hélène Gilbert; Jean-Luc Gourdine
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Gut microbiome composition differences among breeds impact feed efficiency in swine.

Authors:  Matteo Bergamaschi; Francesco Tiezzi; Jeremy Howard; Yi Jian Huang; Kent A Gray; Constantino Schillebeeckx; Nathan P McNulty; Christian Maltecca
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 14.650

8.  Nutrient digestibility, organ morphometry and performance in vaccinated or non-vaccinated Lawsonia intracellularis infected piglets.

Authors:  Christian Visscher; Jasmin Mischok; Saara Sander; Marion Schmicke; Eva-Ursula Peitzmeier; Isabel von dem Busche; Karl Rohn; Josef Kamphues
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 2.741

9.  Continuous Monitoring of Pigs in Fattening Using a Multi-Sensor System: Behavior Patterns.

Authors:  Miguel Garrido-Izard; Eva-Cristina Correa; José-María Requejo; Belén Diezma
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  Feeding behavior of growing and finishing pigs fed different dietary threonine levels in a group-phase feeding and individual precision feeding system.

Authors:  Aline Remus; Luciano Hauschild; Marie-Pierre Létourneau-Montminy; Ines Andretta; Candido Pomar
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2020-09-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.