Literature DB >> 17092548

A new prognostic model for FIGO stage 1 epithelial ovarian cancer.

Andreas Obermair1, Arlan Fuller, Elisa Lopez-Varela, Toon van Gorp, Ignace Vergote, Lynne Eaton, Jeff Fowler, Michael Quinn, Ian Hammond, Donald Marsden, Anthony Proietto, Jonathan Carter, Margaret Davy, Lee Tripcony, Nadeem Abu-Rustum.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: No consensus exists which patients with surgical stage 1 epithelial ovarian should receive postoperative chemotherapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of preoperative CA-125 and to establish a prognostic index to identify patients in different risk categories.
METHODS: Data of 600 surgically staged patients with FIGO stage 1 EOC treated in eleven gynecological cancer centers in Australia, the USA and Europe were analyzed. Eligible patients include those with invasive EOC where a preoperative CA-125 was obtained and standard surgical staging performed. Overall survival (OS) was chosen as study endpoint. Preoperative CA-125 values were compared with other prognostic factors, and univariate and multivariate Cox models were calculated.
RESULTS: Two hundred and one patients (33.5%) had preoperative CA-125 < or =30 U/ml and CA-125 levels < or =30 U/ml were associated with lower grade, sub-stage 1A and mucinous histologic cell type. Patients with elevated CA-125 levels were more likely to receive chemotherapy. OS probability was 95% and 85% for patients with pretreatment CA-125 < or =30 U/ml and >30 U/ml, respectively (p 0.003). Multivariate analysis confirmed preoperative serum CA-125 >30 U/ml (OR 2.7) and age at diagnosis >70 years (OR 2.6) as the only independent predictors for overall survival.
CONCLUSION: Pretreatment of CA-125 < or =30 U/ml dominates over histologic cell type, sub-stage and grade to identify a subgroup of FIGO stage 1 patients with a genuinely good prognosis with extremely good survival and who could possibly be spared with adjuvant chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17092548     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.09.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  5 in total

1.  S3-Guideline on Diagnostics, Therapy and Follow-up of Malignant Ovarian Tumours: Short version 1.0 - AWMF registration number: 032/035OL, June 2013.

Authors:  U Wagner; P Harter; F Hilpert; S Mahner; A Reuß; A du Bois; E Petru; W Meier; P Ortner; K König; K Lindel; D Grab; P Piso; O Ortmann; I Runnebaum; J Pfisterer; D Lüftner; N Frickhofen; F Grünwald; B O Maier; J Diebold; S Hauptmann; F Kommoss; G Emons; B Radeleff; M Gebhardt; N Arnold; G Calaminus; I Weisse; J Weis; J Sehouli; D Fink; A Burges; A Hasenburg; C Eggert
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.915

2.  [New FIGO classification of ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer].

Authors:  A K Höhn; J Einenkel; C Wittekind; L-C Horn
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.011

3.  Survival analysis of revised 2013 FIGO staging classification of epithelial ovarian cancer and comparison with previous FIGO staging classification.

Authors:  E Sun Paik; Yoo-Young Lee; Eun-Jung Lee; Chel Hun Choi; Tae-Joong Kim; Jeong-Won Lee; Duk-Soo Bae; Byoung-Gie Kim
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2015-03-16

4.  Impact of the new FIGO 2013 classification on prognosis of stage I epithelial ovarian cancers.

Authors:  Céline Montavon Sartorius; Uzma Mirza; Andreas Schötzau; Gillian Mackay; Daniel Fink; Neville F Hacker; Viola Heinzelmann-Schwarz
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.989

5.  E-cadherin expression as a prognostic factor in patients with ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chencheng Dai; Jian Cao; Yu Zeng; Sujuan Xu; Xuemei Jia; Pengfei Xu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-06-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.