Literature DB >> 17091842

Dynamic mechanical response of elastic spherical inclusions to impulsive acoustic radiation force excitation.

Mark L Palmeri1, Stephen A McAleavey, Kelly L Fong, Gregg E Trahey, Kathryn R Nightingale.   

Abstract

Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging has been used clinically to study the dynamic response of lesions relative to their background material to focused, impulsive acoustic radiation force excitations through the generation of dynamic displacement field images. Dynamic displacement data are typically displayed as a set of parametric images, including displacement immediately after excitation, maximum displacement, time to peak displacement, and recovery time from peak displacement. To date, however, no definitive trends have been established between these parametric images and the tissues' mechanical properties. This work demonstrates that displacement magnitude, time to peak displacement, and recovery time are all inversely related to the Young's modulus in homogeneous elastic media. Experimentally, pulse repetition frequency during displacement tracking limits stiffness resolution using the time to peak displacement parameter. The excitation pulse duration also impacts the time to peak parameter, with longer pulses reducing the inertial effects present during impulsive excitations. Material density affects tissue dynamics, but is not expected to play a significant role in biological tissues. The presence of an elastic spherical inclusion in the imaged medium significantly alters the tissue dynamics in response to impulsive, focused acoustic radiation force excitations. Times to peak displacement for excitations within and outside an elastic inclusion are still indicative of local material stiffness; however, recovery times are altered due to the reflection and transmission of shear waves at the inclusion boundaries. These shear wave interactions cause stiffer inclusions to appear to be displaced longer than the more compliant background material. The magnitude of shear waves reflected at elastic lesion boundaries is dependent on the stiffness contrast between the inclusion and the background material, and the stiffness and size of the inclusion dictate when shear wave reflections within the lesion will interfere with one another. Jitter and bias associated with the ultrasonic displacement tracking also impact the estimation of a tissue's dynamic response to acoustic radiation force excitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17091842      PMCID: PMC1815395          DOI: 10.1109/tuffc.2006.146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control        ISSN: 0885-3010            Impact factor:   2.725


  25 in total

1.  Shear wave elasticity imaging: a new ultrasonic technology of medical diagnostics.

Authors:  A P Sarvazyan; O V Rudenko; S D Swanson; J B Fowlkes; S Y Emelianov
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 2.  Elastography: ultrasonic estimation and imaging of the elastic properties of tissues.

Authors:  J Ophir; S K Alam; B Garra; F Kallel; E Konofagou; T Krouskop; T Varghese
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.617

3.  Visualization and quantification of breast cancer biomechanical properties with magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  D B Plewes; J Bishop; A Samani; J Sciarretta
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  A method of imaging viscoelastic parameters with acoustic radiation force.

Authors:  W F Walker; F J Fernandez; L A Negron
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Vibro-acoustography: an imaging modality based on ultrasound-stimulated acoustic emission.

Authors:  M Fatemi; J F Greenleaf
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-06-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Selected methods for imaging elastic properties of biological tissues.

Authors:  James F Greenleaf; Mostafa Fatemi; Michael Insana
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2003-04-10       Impact factor: 9.590

7.  A finite-element method model of soft tissue response to impulsive acoustic radiation force.

Authors:  Mark L Palmeri; Amy C Sharma; Richard R Bouchard; Roger W Nightingale; Kathryn R Nightingale
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.725

8.  Calculation of pressure fields from arbitrarily shaped, apodized, and excited ultrasound transducers.

Authors:  J A Jensen; N B Svendsen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.725

9.  Elastostatics of a spherical inclusion in homogeneous biological media.

Authors:  M Bilgen; M F Insana
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  MR elastography of breast cancer: preliminary results.

Authors:  Alexia L McKnight; Jennifer L Kugel; Phillip J Rossman; Armando Manduca; Lynn C Hartmann; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  44 in total

1.  AN OVERVIEW OF ELASTOGRAPHY - AN EMERGING BRANCH OF MEDICAL IMAGING.

Authors:  Armen Sarvazyan; Timothy J Hall; Matthew W Urban; Mostafa Fatemi; Salavat R Aglyamov; Brian S Garra
Journal:  Curr Med Imaging Rev       Date:  2011-11

2.  Liver ablation guidance with acoustic radiation force impulse imaging: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  B J Fahey; S J Hsu; P D Wolf; R C Nelson; G E Trahey
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-07-20       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  A parallel tracking method for acoustic radiation force impulse imaging.

Authors:  Jeremy J Dahl; Gianmarco F Pinton; Mark L Palmeri; Vineet Agrawal; Kathryn R Nightingale; Gregg E Trahey
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Viscoelastic property measurement in thin tissue constructs using ultrasound.

Authors:  Dalong Liu; Emad S Ebbini
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Image quality, tissue heating, and frame rate trade-offs in acoustic radiation force impulse imaging.

Authors:  Richard R Bouchard; Jeremy J Dahl; Stephen J Hsu; Mark L Palmeri; Gregg E Trahey
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  An integrated indenter-ARFI imaging system for tissue stiffness quantification.

Authors:  Liang Zhai; Mark L Palmeri; Richard R Bouchard; Roger W Nightingale; Kathryn R Nightingale
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.578

7.  Contrast in intracardiac acoustic radiation force impulse images of radiofrequency ablation lesions.

Authors:  Stephanie A Eyerly; Tristram D Bahnson; Jason I Koontz; David P Bradway; Douglas M Dumont; Gregg E Trahey; Patrick D Wolf
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.578

8.  High-resolution acoustic-radiation-force-impulse imaging for assessing corneal sclerosis.

Authors:  Cho-Chiang Shih; Chih-Chung Huang; Qifa Zhou; K Kirk Shung
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  On the feasibility of imaging peripheral nerves using acoustic radiation force impulse imaging.

Authors:  Mark L Palmeri; Jeremy J Dahl; David B MacLeod; Stuart A Grant; Kathryn R Nightingale
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.578

10.  Evaluation of pulsed high intensity focused ultrasound exposures on metastasis in a murine model.

Authors:  Hilary Hancock; Matthew R Dreher; Nigel Crawford; Claire B Pollock; Jennifer Shih; Bradford J Wood; Kent Hunter; Victor Frenkel
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 5.150

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.