BACKGROUND: The accuracy of maternal self-reported smoking information, especially exposure to environmental tobacco smoke, has been questioned. This study aimed to validate self-reported smoking, smoking cessation, and environmental tobacco smoke exposure in early and late pregnancy, using the biomarker cotinine as the gold standard. METHODS: Prospective cohort study of 953 pregnant Swedish women between 1996 and 1998. In-person interviews and cotinine measurements were performed at 6-12 and 31-34 completed weeks of gestation. All women were asked about nicotine exposures throughout pregnancy, including cigarette smoking, oral snuff, nicotine replacement therapy, and environmental tobacco smoke exposure. RESULTS: The validity of self-reported daily smoking was high in early and late pregnancy. However, among women reporting smoking cessation before the first interview and between the first and second interviews, 13% and 25% misreported active smoking, respectively. According to cotinine measurements, 22% of non-smoking women were exposed to environmental tobacco smoke in early pregnancy, and 8% were exposed in late pregnancy. Self-reported information on environmental tobacco smoke exposure in early and late pregnancy misclassified most exposed women as unexposed. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that self-reported smoking information among pregnant women can be trusted. However, among women reporting smoking cessation during pregnancy, the misclassification rate increased with recency of quitting. Environmental tobacco smoke exposure was common among non-smokers, and the low validity of self-reported environmental tobacco smoke exposure suggests that future studies on environmental tobacco smoke exposure and risks of pregnancy outcomes may have to rely on biomarker assessments.
BACKGROUND: The accuracy of maternal self-reported smoking information, especially exposure to environmental tobacco smoke, has been questioned. This study aimed to validate self-reported smoking, smoking cessation, and environmental tobacco smoke exposure in early and late pregnancy, using the biomarker cotinine as the gold standard. METHODS: Prospective cohort study of 953 pregnant Swedish women between 1996 and 1998. In-person interviews and cotinine measurements were performed at 6-12 and 31-34 completed weeks of gestation. All women were asked about nicotine exposures throughout pregnancy, including cigarette smoking, oral snuff, nicotine replacement therapy, and environmental tobacco smoke exposure. RESULTS: The validity of self-reported daily smoking was high in early and late pregnancy. However, among women reporting smoking cessation before the first interview and between the first and second interviews, 13% and 25% misreported active smoking, respectively. According to cotinine measurements, 22% of non-smoking women were exposed to environmental tobacco smoke in early pregnancy, and 8% were exposed in late pregnancy. Self-reported information on environmental tobacco smoke exposure in early and late pregnancy misclassified most exposed women as unexposed. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that self-reported smoking information among pregnant women can be trusted. However, among women reporting smoking cessation during pregnancy, the misclassification rate increased with recency of quitting. Environmental tobacco smoke exposure was common among non-smokers, and the low validity of self-reported environmental tobacco smoke exposure suggests that future studies on environmental tobacco smoke exposure and risks of pregnancy outcomes may have to rely on biomarker assessments.
Authors: Brian K Lee; Renee M Gardner; Henrik Dal; Anna Svensson; Maria Rosaria Galanti; Dheeraj Rai; Christina Dalman; Cecilia Magnusson Journal: J Autism Dev Disord Date: 2012-09
Authors: Peter Ueda; Sven Cnattingius; Olof Stephansson; Erik Ingelsson; Jonas F Ludvigsson; Anna-Karin Edstedt Bonamy Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2014-04-01 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: Alison C Holloway; Donald Q Cuu; Katherine M Morrison; Hertzel C Gerstein; Mark A Tarnopolsky Journal: Endocrine Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: Srmena Krstev; Jelena Marinković; Snežana Simić; Nikola Kocev; Susan J Bondy Journal: Int J Public Health Date: 2011-09-16 Impact factor: 3.380
Authors: Lucina Suarez; Tunu Ramadhani; Marilyn Felkner; Mark A Canfield; Jean D Brender; Paul A Romitti; Lixian Sun Journal: Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol Date: 2010-11-15
Authors: Amanda Ode; Lars Rylander; Christian H Lindh; Karin Källén; Bo A G Jönsson; Peik Gustafsson; Per Olofsson; Sten A Ivarsson; Anna Rignell-Hydbom Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2013-02-24 Impact factor: 4.223
Authors: Yueh-Hsiu Chiu; Jaime E Hart; Donna Spiegelman; Eric Garshick; Thomas J Smith; Douglas W Dockery; S Katharine Hammond; Francine Laden Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 9.031