Literature DB >> 17090555

Developing a center for comparative effectiveness information.

Gail R Wilensky1.   

Abstract

Interest in objective, credible comparative clinical effectiveness information has been growing in the United States, both by those who support competitive behavior in health care and by those who support administered pricing. The Medicare drug benefit has heightened interest in better information, although the potential payoff is even greater for medical procedures than for drugs, since procedures account for more of the health care dollar. Careful consideration needs to be given regarding the appropriate structure, placement, financing, and function of an agency devoted to comparative effectiveness if it is to achieve its objective: a mechanism to support better decision making in health care.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17090555     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.w572

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  21 in total

1.  No head-to-head trial? simulate the missing arms.

Authors:  J Jaime Caro; K Jack Ishak
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  EBM, HTA, and CER: clearing the confusion.

Authors:  Bryan R Luce; Michael Drummond; Bengt Jönsson; Peter J Neumann; J Sanford Schwartz; Uwe Siebert; Sean D Sullivan
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.911

3.  Commentary: a progress report on AHRQ's Effective Health Care Program.

Authors:  Carolyn M Clancy; Jean R Slutsky
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Pharmacogenomics, evidence, and the role of payers.

Authors:  P A Deverka
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 2.000

5.  Roundtable on expanding capacity for comparative effectiveness research in the United States: discussion took place on June 3, 2007, at the AcademyHealth Annual Research Meetingin Orlando, FL.

Authors:  Sean Tunis; Carolyn Clancy; W David Helms; J Michael McGinnis; Steven D Pearson
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Comparative effectiveness research and evidence-based health policy: experience from four countries.

Authors:  Kalipso Chalkidou; Sean Tunis; Ruth Lopert; Lise Rochaix; Peter T Sawicki; Mona Nasser; Bertrand Xerri
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.911

Review 7.  Cost, coverage, and comparative effectiveness research: the critical issues for oncology.

Authors:  Steven D Pearson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Diagnostic accuracy of C-reactive protein and white blood cell counts in the early detection of inflammatory complications after open resection of colorectal cancer: a retrospective study of 1,187 patients.

Authors:  Rene Warschkow; Ignazio Tarantino; Michael Torzewski; Franziska Näf; Jochen Lange; Thomas Steffen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Model for a patient-centered comparative effectiveness research center.

Authors:  Monica R Costlow; Douglas P Landsittel; A Everette James; Jeremy M Kahn; Sally C Morton
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 4.689

Review 10.  The policy debate over public investment in comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Eugene C Rich
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.