Stability of sitting postures: the influence of degrees of freedom.

Observational studies of sitting have shown that, during spontaneous sitting, people adopt a variety of postures. Various researchers have formulated theories to explain why people adopt their sitting postures. Branton (1969) hypothesized that there is continual need for postural stability while sitting. Dempster (1955) stated that additional stability could be obtained through temporarily closing chains of body segments, or, in other words, through decreasing the number of degrees of freedom of the body. The present study elaborates on Dempster's theory. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of the degrees of freedom of the body on postural stability in sitting postures. For 21 different sitting postures, the total number of degrees of freedom was determined. Postural sway, a measure for postural stability, was determined using a 3D motion and position measurement system with ten healthy subjects. This study shows that the mean path length at the level of the second thoracic vertebra (PL0.05), a measure derived from postural sway, increases significantly (p < 0.0001) with an increase of the number of degrees of freedom of the body (DoFB). Closer examination of the data showed that a model taking into account only the degrees of freedom of the lumbar and thoracic spine and pelvis seems to be a better predictor of postural sway than the total number of degrees of freedom of the body.