Literature DB >> 17089671

Sexual dimorphism, reproductive strategy, and human activities determine resource use by brown bears.

Karyn D Rode1, Sean D Farley, Charles T Robbins.   

Abstract

Despite significant sexual dimorphism and differing reproductive strategies in carnivores, sexual segregation is rarely studied and is often overlooked in the management of wild populations. Potential nutritional constraints imposed by sexual dimorphism and differing reproductive strategies between the sexes have important implications, particularly when combined with differential effects of human activities on sex and age classes. We examined the effects of sexual dimorphism, reproductive strategies, and human activities (bear-viewing and hunting) on resource use by different sex and age classes of brown bears (Ursus arctos). Sexual segregation of habitat use and effects of experimental bear-viewing were quantified at a single site in south-central Alaska, U.S.A., by capturing, collaring, and observing brown bears at a salt marsh and salmon stream. Effects of salmon capture rate, availability of alternative salmon runs, harvest pressure, and numbers of annual visitors on sex and age class use were examined from data collected or previously published from 13 other sites. Bear-viewing sites on salmon streams where salmon capture rates were low (<4 salmon/hour) resulted in low use by adult males (<10% of all bears), except for sites with falls. However, maximum male use of viewing areas also depended on the availability of alternative salmon streams and harvest pressure. Use of habitats by females with dependent young was significantly related to the prevalence of adult males at the site. Thus, both sexual dimorphism and differing reproductive strategies led to sexual segregation in habitat use by bears. As a result of infanticide, females with young appear to prioritize avoidance of male bears over avoidance of humans when choosing habitats, in contrast to responses documented in herbivores. Because carnivores often exhibit both sexual dimorphism and infanticide, selection for sexual segregation is likely to be high. In these cases, the nutritional demands of large adult males, balanced with responses to human activity, drive dynamic temporal and spatial distributions of individuals in the population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17089671     DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2636:sdrsah]2.0.co;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  23 in total

1.  Hourly movement decisions indicate how a large carnivore inhabits developed landscapes.

Authors:  Michael J Evans; Jason E Hawley; Paul W Rego; Tracy A G Rittenhouse
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Decline and recovery of a large carnivore: environmental change and long-term trends in an endangered brown bear population.

Authors:  Isabel Martínez Cano; Fernando González Taboada; Javier Naves; Alberto Fernández-Gil; Thorsten Wiegand
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Predators or prey? Spatio-temporal discrimination of human-derived risk by brown bears.

Authors:  Andrés Ordiz; Ole-Gunnar Støen; Miguel Delibes; Jon E Swenson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-02-06       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Fast carnivores and slow herbivores: differential foraging strategies among grizzly bears in the Canadian Arctic.

Authors:  Mark A Edwards; Andrew E Derocher; Keith A Hobson; Marsha Branigan; John A Nagy
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-12-12       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Despotism and risk of infanticide influence grizzly bear den-site selection.

Authors:  Nathan S Libal; Jerrold L Belant; Bruce D Leopold; Guiming Wang; Patricia A Owen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A "clearcut" case? Brown bear selection of coarse woody debris and carpenter ants on clearcuts.

Authors:  Shane C Frank; Sam M J G Steyaert; Jon E Swenson; Ilse Storch; Jonas Kindberg; Hanna Barck; Andreas Zedrosser
Journal:  For Ecol Manage       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.558

7.  Spatial analysis of factors influencing long-term stress in the grizzly bear (Ursus arctos) population of Alberta, Canada.

Authors:  Mathieu L Bourbonnais; Trisalyn A Nelson; Marc R L Cattet; Chris T Darimont; Gordon B Stenhouse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Competitive asymmetries in the use of supplementary food by the endangered Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus).

Authors:  José V López-Bao; Alejandro Rodríguez; Francisco Palomares
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Gaining insight into the assimilated diet of small bear populations by stable isotope analysis.

Authors:  Giulio Careddu; Paolo Ciucci; Stella Mondovì; Edoardo Calizza; Loreto Rossi; Maria Letizia Costantini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Male reproductive strategy explains spatiotemporal segregation in brown bears.

Authors:  Sam M J G Steyaert; Jonas Kindberg; Jon E Swenson; Andreas Zedrosser
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 5.091

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.