Literature DB >> 17088659

Outcome after closed functional treatment of humeral shaft fractures.

Radford Ekholm1, Jan Tidermark, Hans Törnkvist, Johanna Adami, Sari Ponzer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the outcome after an isolated humeral shaft fracture treated primarily nonoperatively with a fracture brace.
SETTING: University hospital.
DESIGN: Descriptive study. Retrospective assessment of clinical and radiographic healing. Prospective assessment of functional outcome and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). PATIENTS: Seventy-eight patients (female, n = 45), mean age 58 (range, 16-91) years with isolated humeral shaft fractures. INTERVENTION: Closed functional treatment with a fracture brace. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Fracture healing, need for revision surgery, Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA), HRQoL according to the Short Form 36 (SF-36) and patient-reported recovery.
RESULTS: Ninety percent of the fractures healed after nonoperative treatment, and nearly 90% of the nonunions healed after revision surgery. There was a trend toward more frequent nonunions in simple fractures, that is, type A according to the Orthopedic Trauma Association (OTA) classification (P = 0.08). The nonunion rate in type A fractures located in the proximal and middle part of the shaft was approximately 20%. Nearly 50% of the patients reported full recovery after successful nonoperative treatment, but none of the patients with a healed nonunion did after revision surgery (P < 0.05). The SMFA scores for arm/hand function were acceptable for the patients who healed after the primary fracture-brace treatment, but the values were worse for those with a healed nonunion after revision surgery. The SF-36 scores were generally slightly lower compared with a Swedish reference population.
CONCLUSION: This study confirms the high overall rate of union of humeral shaft fractures and an acceptable functional outcome after successful fracture-brace treatment. However, in simple (type A) fractures, the nonunion rate seems to be higher, and patients with healed nonunions after revision surgery reported worse functional outcomes. Based on these findings, it seems reasonable to explore the use of plate fixation compared with nonoperative treatment for selected fracture types in a randomized controlled trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17088659     DOI: 10.1097/01.bot.0000246466.01287.04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  40 in total

1.  Plating osteosynthesis of mid-distal humeral shaft fractures: minimally invasive versus conventional open reduction technique.

Authors:  Zhiquan An; Bingfang Zeng; Xiaojian He; Qi Chen; Shundong Hu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Best care paradigm to optimize functionality after extra-articular distal humeral fractures in the young patient.

Authors:  Mark S Ayoub; Ivan S Tarkin
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-02-07

3.  Does additional head trauma affect the long-term outcome after upper extremity trauma in multiple traumatized patients: is there an additional effect of traumatic brain injury?

Authors:  Hagen Andruszkow; Christian Probst; Orna Grün; Christian Krettek; Frank Hildebrand
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  The treatment of distal third humeral diaphyseal fractures: Is there still a place for the external fixation?

Authors:  N Tartaglia; G Vicenti; M Carrozzo; A Abate; F Rifino; G Picca; G Solarino; B Moretti
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-11-30

5.  Initial management of humeral shaft fractures with functional splints versus coaptation splints.

Authors:  Lori R Chambers; Parker Juels; Cyril Mauffrey; Joshua A Parry
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-01-08

6.  Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Danish version of the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire (SMFA).

Authors:  Marianne Lindahl; Signe Andersen; Annette Joergensen; Christian Frandsen; Liselotte Jensen; Eirikur Benedikz
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Humeral shaft fractures: results of operative and non-operative treatment.

Authors:  Edward Westrick; Benjamin Hamilton; Paul Toogood; Bradford Henley; Reza Firoozabadi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Study on outcome of fracture shaft of the humerus treated non-operatively with a functional brace.

Authors:  K C Kapil Mani; D C Gopal Sagar; Laxman Rijal; K C Govinda; Binaya Lal Shrestha
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2012-04-07

9.  Treatment Outcome of Intramedullary Fixation with a Locked Rigid Nail in Humeral Shaft Fractures.

Authors:  Mohsen Mardani Kivi; Mehran Soleymanha; Zahra Haghparast-Ghadim-Limudahi
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2016-01

10.  The standardized exploration of the radial nerve during humeral shaft fixation reduces the incidence of iatrogenic palsy.

Authors:  Rebekah Belayneh; Connor P Littlefield; Sanjit R Konda; Kari Broder; David N Kugelman; Philipp Leucht; Kenneth A Egol
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.