Literature DB >> 17088363

Osmotic adjustment in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) results in no yield benefit under terminal drought.

Neil C Turner1, Shahal Abbo, Jens D Berger, S K Chaturvedi, Robert J French, Christiane Ludwig, D M Mannur, S J Singh, H S Yadava.   

Abstract

Variation in osmotic adjustment (OA) among chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars has been observed when exposed to terminal drought, but some studies suggest that this benefits yield while others suggest it does not benefit yield in water-limited environments. In the present study, parents differing in OA were crossed and a set of advanced breeding lines (ABLs) developed for yield testing. The variation in OA during podding was measured under terminal drought in the F(2), F(3), F(7), and F(8) progeny and in the parents by either rehydrating the leaves before sampling for osmotic potential (OP) or by measuring the relative water content (RWC) and OP on adjacent leaves for the calculation of the OP at full turgor. Yields were measured in the F(8) progeny under terminal drought in Australia and India. While differences in OA were measured in the chickpea lines and parents, OA varied from year to year and did not consistently benefit yield when measured in the field under terminal drought. In Australia, differences in OA were not associated with any yield benefit in any year, while in India early flowering resulted in higher yields at three of the four sites, and OA had an inconsistent effect on seed yields. A comparison of OP at full turgor measured after rehydration and from measurements of RWC and OP showed that the rehydration technique underestimated OA. The lack of contribution of OA to yield of chickpea is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17088363     DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erl192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Bot        ISSN: 0022-0957            Impact factor:   6.992


  17 in total

1.  A genome-scale integrated approach aids in genetic dissection of complex flowering time trait in chickpea.

Authors:  Hari D Upadhyaya; Deepak Bajaj; Shouvik Das; Maneesha S Saxena; Saurabh Badoni; Vinod Kumar; Shailesh Tripathi; C L L Gowda; Shivali Sharma; Akhilesh K Tyagi; Swarup K Parida
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 4.076

Review 2.  Transgenic approaches for abiotic stress tolerance in plants: retrospect and prospects.

Authors:  Pooja Bhatnagar-Mathur; V Vadez; Kiran K Sharma
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 4.570

3.  Comparative physiological and leaf proteome analysis between drought-tolerant chickpea Cicer reticulatum and drought-sensitive chickpea C. arietinum.

Authors:  Sertan Cevik; Gurler Akpinar; Aytunc Yildizli; Murat Kasap; Kubra Karaosmanoglu; Serpil Unyayar
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.826

4.  Structural changes in senescing oilseed rape leaves at tissue and subcellular levels monitored by nuclear magnetic resonance relaxometry through water status.

Authors:  Maja Musse; Loriane De Franceschi; Mireille Cambert; Clément Sorin; Françoise Le Caherec; Agnès Burel; Alain Bouchereau; François Mariette; Laurent Leport
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Distinctive phytohormonal and metabolic profiles of Arabidopsis thaliana and Eutrema salsugineum under similar soil drying.

Authors:  Carla Pinheiro; Elizabeth Dickinson; Andrew Marriott; Isa C Ribeiro; Marta Pintó-Marijuan; Carla António; Olfa Zarrouk; Maria Manuela Chaves; Ian C Dodd; Sergi Munné-Bosch; Jane Thomas-Oates; Julie Wilson
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 4.116

6.  Salt sensitivity in chickpea is determined by sodium toxicity.

Authors:  Hammad A Khan; Kadambot H M Siddique; Timothy D Colmer
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 4.116

7.  Phenotyping chickpeas and pigeonpeas for adaptation to drought.

Authors:  H D Upadhyaya; J Kashiwagi; R K Varshney; P M Gaur; K B Saxena; L Krishnamurthy; C L L Gowda; R P S Pundir; S K Chaturvedi; P S Basu; I P Singh
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Genetic Diversity and Physiological Performance of Portuguese Wild Beet (Beta vulgaris spp. maritima) from Three Contrasting Habitats.

Authors:  Isa C Ribeiro; Carla Pinheiro; Carla M Ribeiro; Maria M Veloso; Maria C Simoes-Costa; Isabel Evaristo; Octávio S Paulo; Cândido P Ricardo
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Both Male and Female Malfunction Contributes to Yield Reduction under Water Stress during Meiosis in Bread Wheat.

Authors:  Ifeyinwa Onyemaobi; Hui Liu; Kadambot H M Siddique; Guijun Yan
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  Flower numbers, pod production, pollen viability, and pistil function are reduced and flower and pod abortion increased in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under terminal drought.

Authors:  Xiangwen Fang; Neil C Turner; Guijun Yan; Fengmin Li; Kadambot H M Siddique
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 6.992

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.