Literature DB >> 17087959

Outcome prediction in trauma.

Omar Bouamra1, Alan Wrotchford, Sally Hollis, Andy Vail, Maralyn Woodford, Fiona Lecky.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN), currently the largest trauma network in Europe, outcome prediction is performed using the TRISS methodology since 1989. Its database contains 200,000 hospital admissions from 110 hospitals over the country, but a large amount of data is lost for the modelling because of missing data. To improve some of the shortcomings of TRISS a new model was developed.
METHODS: The data for modelling consisted of 100,399 hospital trauma admissions over the period 1996 to 2001. Using the Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) instead of RTS has dramatically reduced the number of missing cases. Gender and its interaction with age have also been included in the model. The model was tested on different subsets of cases traditionally excluded, such as children, those with penetrating injuries, and ventilated and transferred patients. The new model included all those subsets using age, a transformation of ISS, GCS, gender and gender by age interaction as predictors.
RESULTS: The model has shown a good discriminant ability tested by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AROC) curve. The values of the AROC for the new model were 0.947 (95% CI: 0.943-0.951) on the prediction set and 0.952 (95% CI: 0.946-0.957) on the validation set compared respectively with 0.937 (95% CI: 0.932-0.943) and 0.941 (95% CI: 0.936-0.952) for TRISS.
CONCLUSION: The new model has enabled us to include most of the cases that were excluded under the TRISS's inclusion criteria, less missing data are incurred and the predictive performance was significantly better than that of the TRISS model as shown by the AROC curves.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17087959     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.07.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  14 in total

1.  Update of the trauma risk adjustment model of the TraumaRegister DGU™: the Revised Injury Severity Classification, version II.

Authors:  Rolf Lefering; Stefan Huber-Wagner; Ulrike Nienaber; Marc Maegele; Bertil Bouillon
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 9.097

2.  Prehospital transport of patients with spinal cord injury in Nigeria.

Authors:  Kawu A Ahidjo; Salami A Olayinka; Olawepo Ayokunle; Alimi F Mustapha; Gbadegesin A A Sulaiman; Adebule T Gbolahan
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 3.  Head Injury- A Maxillofacial Surgeon's Perspective.

Authors:  Muralee Mohan Choonthar; Ananthan Raghothaman; Rajendra Prasad; S Pradeep; Kalpa Pandya
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-01-01

4.  New Injury Severity Score is a better predictor of mortality for blunt trauma patients than the Injury Severity Score.

Authors:  Hani O Eid; Fikri M Abu-Zidan
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Traumatic brain injuries and maxillofacial fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ahmad Othman; Feras Al-Mofreh Al-Qahtani; Haif Al-Qahtani; Mohamed Jaber; Khaled Bishawi; Amar Hassan Khamis; Ahmed Al-Shanably
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2022-05-24

6.  In search of benchmarking for mortality following multiple trauma: a Swiss trauma center experience.

Authors:  Ida Füglistaler-Montali; Corinna Attenberger; Philipp Füglistaler; Augustinus L Jacob; Felix Amsler; Thomas Gross
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 7.  Systematic review of predictive performance of injury severity scoring tools.

Authors:  Hideo Tohira; Ian Jacobs; David Mountain; Nick Gibson; Allen Yeo
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  The Utstein template for uniform reporting of data following major trauma: a joint revision by SCANTEM, TARN, DGU-TR and RITG.

Authors:  Kjetil G Ringdal; Timothy J Coats; Rolf Lefering; Stefano Di Bartolomeo; Petter Andreas Steen; Olav Røise; Lauri Handolin; Hans Morten Lossius
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  Comparison of the predictive performance of the BIG, TRISS, and PS09 score in an adult trauma population derived from multiple international trauma registries.

Authors:  Thomas Brockamp; Marc Maegele; Christine Gaarder; J Carel Goslings; Mitchell J Cohen; Rolf Lefering; Pieter Joosse; Paal A Naess; Nils O Skaga; Tahnee Groat; Simon Eaglestone; Matthew A Borgman; Philip C Spinella; Martin A Schreiber; Karim Brohi
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Combining the new injury severity score with an anatomical polytrauma injury variable predicts mortality better than the new injury severity score and the injury severity score: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ting Hway Wong; Gita Krishnaswamy; Nivedita Vikas Nadkarni; Hai V Nguyen; Gek Hsiang Lim; Dianne Carrol Tan Bautista; Ming Terk Chiu; Khuan Yew Chow; Marcus Eng Hock Ong
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.