Literature DB >> 17086657

Open magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners.

D Hailey1.   

Abstract

(1) In most MRI scanners, the patient examination table fits inside a long cylindrical tube. Large patients cannot be accommodated, and some persons experience claustrophobic reactions. Open MRI systems, in which the patient is placed between two plates, overcome these disadvantages. (2) Open MRI scanners are widely used in health care. High-field closed MRI systems are preferred for many examinations. (3) Early versions of open MRI scanners had low magnetic field strength, gave poorer image quality than most closed systems, and required longer examination times. Newer open scanners include machines with higher magnetic field strengths and improved image quality. (4) Closed high magnetic field scanners with short magnets and wide bore tubes offer improved comfort to patients, and may be an alternative to open scanners. (5) There is interest in using open systems for intra-operative and image-guided interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17086657

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Issues Emerg Health Technol        ISSN: 1488-6316


  5 in total

1.  Contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging of claustrophobic or oversized patients using an open low-field magnet.

Authors:  M Calabrese; D Brizzi; L Carbonaro; M Chiaramondia; M A Kirchin; F Sardanelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Reduction of claustrophobia during magnetic resonance imaging: methods and design of the "CLAUSTRO" randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Judith Enders; Elke Zimmermann; Matthias Rief; Peter Martus; Randolf Klingebiel; Patrick Asbach; Christian Klessen; Gerd Diederichs; Thomas Bengner; Ulf Teichgräber; Bernd Hamm; Marc Dewey
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 1.930

3.  High-field open versus short-bore magnetic resonance imaging of the spine: a randomized controlled comparison of image quality.

Authors:  Judith Enders; Matthias Rief; Elke Zimmermann; Patrick Asbach; Gerd Diederichs; Christoph Wetz; Eberhard Siebert; Moritz Wagner; Bernd Hamm; Marc Dewey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Survey of magnetic resonance imaging availability in West Africa.

Authors:  Godwin Inalegwu Ogbole; Adekunle Olakunle Adeyomoye; Augustina Badu-Peprah; Yaw Mensah; Donald Amasike Nzeh
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2018-07-31

5.  Ex vivo comparison of 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging and multidetector computed tomography arthrography to identify artificial soft tissue lesions in equine stifles.

Authors:  Anton D Aßmann; Stefanie Ohlerth; José Suárez Sánchez-Andráde; Paul R Torgerson; Andrea S Bischofberger
Journal:  Vet Surg       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 1.618

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.