Literature DB >> 17086581

Prenatal diagnosis of open and closed spina bifida.

T Ghi1, G Pilu, P Falco, M Segata, A Carletti, G Cocchi, D Santini, P Bonasoni, G Tani, N Rizzo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify criteria useful for differentiating closed from open spina bifida antenatally. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of cases of spina bifida diagnosed in a referral center between 1997 and 2004.
RESULTS: Of 66 cases of fetal spina bifida diagnosed at a median gestational age of 21 (range, 16-34) weeks, detailed follow-up was available for 57. Of these, open defects were found in 53 (93.0%) and closed defects in four (7.0%). Closed spina bifida was associated in two cases with a posterior cystic mass with thick walls and a complex appearance, while in two cases the spinal lesion could not be clearly differentiated from an open defect, particularly at mid-gestation. Open spina bifida was always associated with typical alterations of cranial anatomy, including the so-called 'banana' and 'lemon' signs, while in closed spina bifida the cranium was unremarkable. When the data were available, levels of amniotic fluid alpha-fetoprotein were always abnormally elevated with open spina bifida and within normal limits with closed forms.
CONCLUSION: In this study 7% of cases of spina bifida diagnosed in utero were closed. The differentiation between open and closed forms is best shown by the sonographic demonstration of abnormal or normal cranial anatomy. Copyright 2006 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17086581     DOI: 10.1002/uog.3865

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  6 in total

1.  Prenatal US evaluation of the spinal cord using high-frequency linear transducers.

Authors:  Eléonore Blondiaux; Eldad Katorza; Jonathan Rosenblatt; Catherine Nahama-Allouche; Marion Lenoir; Hubert Ducou le Pointe; Catherine Garel
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2011-01-11

Review 2.  Prenatal diagnosis of spina bifida: from intracranial translucency to intrauterine surgery.

Authors:  Waldo Sepulveda; Amy E Wong; Francisco Sepulveda; Juan L Alcalde; Juan C Devoto; Felipe Otayza
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 3.  Pregnancy termination following prenatal diagnosis of anencephaly or spina bifida: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Candice Y Johnson; Margaret A Honein; W Dana Flanders; Penelope P Howards; Godfrey P Oakley; Sonja A Rasmussen
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2012-10-25

Review 4.  Overview on neural tube defects: From development to physical characteristics.

Authors:  Laura Avagliano; Valentina Massa; Timothy M George; Sarah Qureshy; Gaetano Pietro Bulfamante; Richard H Finnell
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 2.344

5.  Ultrasound in Prenatal Diagnostics and Its Impact on the Epidemiology of Spina Bifida in a National Cohort from Denmark with a Comparison to Sweden.

Authors:  Charlotte Rosenkrantz Bodin; Mikkel Mylius Rasmussen; Ann Tabor; Lena Westbom; Eleonor Tiblad; Charlotte Kvist Ekelund; Camilla Bernt Wulff; Ida Vogel; Olav Bjørn Petersen
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Cranial findings detected by second-trimester ultrasound in fetuses with myelomeningocele: a systematic review.

Authors:  Y Kunpalin; J Richter; N Mufti; J Bosteels; S Ourselin; P De Coppi; D Thompson; A L David; J Deprest
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 7.331

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.