Literature DB >> 17086376

Liver tissue dissection: ultrasonic or RFA energy?

Evangelos Felekouras1, Evangelos Prassas, Michael Kontos, Ioannis Papaconstantinou, Emmanouil Pikoulis, Athanasios Giannopoulos, Christos Tsigris, Michael Tzivras, Chris Bakogiannis, Michael Safioleas, Efstathios Papalambros, Elias Bastounis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hepatic resection is the only potential curative treatment for a wide variety of conditions. However, liver surgery is technically demanding and closely associated with a number of serious complications. New devices and techniques are currently being applied in practice, which will improve the surgical outcome.
METHODS: This retrospective study compares two methods of liver parenchymal division: ultrasound energy, a modern but already widely used technique, and radio-frequency ablation (RFA), a completely novel method. The parameters investigated include the amount of blood transfused, the necessity of the Pringle maneuver, the length of time required for parenchymal division, and postoperative morbidity and mortality. The patients were divided into two groups. In one group (Group A), 15 patients underwent 17 ultrasound-assisted liver resections, in which ten metastatic tumors, six hepatomas, and one cholangiocarcinoma were resected. In Group B, 21 patients underwent 22 RFA-assisted hepatectomies in which 11 metastatic tumors, ten hepatomas, and two cholangiocarcinomas were removed.
RESULTS: Thirteen patients (87%) in Group A and 11 (52%) in Group B received a transfusion, with an average of 3.5 and 1.6 units of red blood cells, respectively. The Pringle maneuver was necessary in two cases in Group A but was unnecessary in Group B. The mean length of time required for parenchymal dissection was 124 min in Group A and 93.18 min in Group B. One (6.7%) and four (19%) complications were observed in Group A and B, respectively (statistically not significant). Mortality remained zero in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: RFA energy provides a novel reliable and safe alternative that can be used exclusively or as a supplement to the older techniques. Both resection time and amount of blood transfusion were reduced in the RFA group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17086376     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-005-0468-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  28 in total

1.  Hepatic resection using the harmonic scalpel.

Authors:  H Sugo; Y Mikami; F Matsumoto; H Tsumura; Y Watanabe; K Kojima; S Futagawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 2.  A review of techniques for liver resection.

Authors:  A G Heriot; N D Karanjia
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Hepatectomy using intraoperative ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation.

Authors:  Dimitris Zacharoulis; Vipin Asopa; Giuseppe Navarra; Joanna P Nicholls; Steen L Jensen; Nagy A Habib
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2003 Apr-Jun

4.  In-line radiofrequency ablation to minimize blood loss in hepatic parenchymal transection.

Authors:  Koroush S Haghighi; Frank Wang; Julie King; Steven Daniel; David L Morris
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Segmental and subsegmental resections of the cirrhotic liver under hepatic inflow and outflow occlusion.

Authors:  N Nagasue; H Yukaya; Y Ogawa; S Hirose; M Okita
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Estimation of risk of major complications after hepatic resection.

Authors:  M Shimada; T Matsumata; K Akazawa; T Kamakura; H Itasaka; K Sugimachi; Y Nose
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Intraoperative ultrasonographic study of the liver. Methods and anatomic results.

Authors:  D Castaing; F Kunstlinger; N Habib; H Bismuth
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Selective hepatic vascular exclusion versus Pringle maneuver in major liver resections: prospective study.

Authors:  Vassilios E Smyrniotis; Georgia G Kostopanagiotou; John C Contis; Charalampos I Farantos; Dionisios C Voros; Dimitrios C Kannas; John S Koskinas
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Hepatic resections using a water-cooled, high-density, monopolar device: a new technology for safer surgery.

Authors:  Isidoro Di Carlo; Francesco Barbagallo; Adriana Toro; Maria Sofia; Tommaso Guastella; Ferdinando Latteri
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 10.  Laparoscopic liver resection: benefits and controversies.

Authors:  Michel Gagner; Tomasz Rogula; Don Selzer
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.741

View more
  4 in total

1.  Low-dose steroid pretreatment ameliorates the transient impairment of liver regeneration.

Authors:  Toshihito Shibata; Toru Mizuguchi; Yukio Nakamura; Masaki Kawamoto; Makoto Meguro; Shigenori Ota; Koichi Hirata; Hidekazu Ooe; Toshihiro Mitaka
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Hepatic parenchymal transection: equally feasible using different radiofrequency devices?

Authors:  Isidoro Di Carlo
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Bleeding in Hepatic Surgery: Sorting through Methods to Prevent It.

Authors:  Fabrizio Romano; Mattia Garancini; Fabio Uggeri; Luca Degrate; Luca Nespoli; Luca Gianotti; Angelo Nespoli; Franco Uggeri
Journal:  HPB Surg       Date:  2012-11-18

4.  Coexistence of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) and colorectal adenocarcinoma: A case report.

Authors:  Papalambros Efstathios; Petrou Athanasios; Ioannis Papaconstantinou; Papalambros Alexandros; Sigala Frangisca; Georgopoulos Sotirios; Felekouras Evangelos; Giannopoulos Athanasios
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 2.754

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.