Literature DB >> 17085337

Resective surgery for liver tumor: a multivariate analysis of causes and risk factors linked to postoperative complications.

Enrico Benzoni1, Dario Lorenzin, Umberto Baccarani, Gian Luigi Adani, Alessandro Favero, Alessandro Cojutti, Fabrizio Bresadola, Alessandro Uzzau.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In spite of accurate selection of patients eligible for resection, and although advances in surgical techniques and perioperative management have greatly contributed to reducing the rate of perioperative deaths, stress must be placed on reducing the postoperative complication rates reported to be still as high as 50%. This study was designed to analyze the causes and foreseeable risk factors linked to postoperative morbidity on the grounds of data derived from a single-center surgical population.
METHODS: From September 1989 to March 2005, 287 consecutive patients, affected either with HCC or liver metastasis, had liver resection at our department. Among the HCC series we recorded 98 patients (73.2%) in Child-Pugh class A, 32 (23.8%) in class B and 4 in class C (3%). In 104 colorectal metastases, 71% were due to colon cancer, 25% rectal, 3% sigmoid, and 1% anorectal. In 49 non-colorectal metastases, 22.4% were derived from breast cancer, 63.2% gastrointestinal tumors (excluding colon) and 14.4% other cancers. We performed 80 wedge resections, 77 bisegmentectomies and/or left lobectomies, 74 segmentectomies, 22 major hepatectomies, 20 left hepatectomies, and 14 trisegmentectomies.
RESULTS: The in-hospital mortality rate in this series was 4.5%, and the morbidity rate was 47.7%, because of pleural effusion (30%), hepatic abscess (25%), hepatic insufficiency (19%), ascites (10%), hemoperitoneum (10%), or biliary fistula (6%). The variables associated with the technical aspects of the surgical procedure that were responsible for the complications were: a Pringle maneuver length more than 20 minutes (P=0.001); the type of liver resection procedure, including major hepatectomy (P=0.02), left hepatectomy (P=0.04), trisegmentectomy (P=0.04), bisegmentectomy and/or left lobectomy (P=0.04); and a blood transfusion of more than 600 ml (P=0.04).
CONCLUSION: The evaluation of causes and foreseeable risk factors linked to postoperative morbidity during the planning of surgical treatment should play the same role as other factors weighed in the selection of patients eligible for liver resection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17085337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int


  16 in total

1.  Estimate or calculate? How surgeons rate volumes and surfaces.

Authors:  Jochen Schuld; Otto Kollmar; Roland Seidel; Catherine Black; Martin K Schilling; Sven Richter
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 2.  Management of post-hepatectomy complications.

Authors:  Shan Jin; Quan Fu; Gerile Wuyun; Tu Wuyun
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Intermittent pringle maneuver and hepatic function: perioperative monitoring by noninvasive ICG-clearance.

Authors:  José Guilherme Tralhão; Emir Hoti; Bárbara Oliveiros; Ana M Abrantes; M Filomena Botelho; F Castro-Sousa
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Post hepatectomy liver failure: concept of management.

Authors:  Kaushal Yadav; Shailesh Shrikhande; Mahesh Goel
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2014-12

5.  Contrast-enhanced MR cholangiography (MRCP) with GD-EOB-DTPA in evaluating biliary complications after surgery.

Authors:  L Salvolini; C Urbinati; G Valeri; C Ferrara; A Giovagnoni
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  Liver abscess after liver metastasectomy is a poor prognostic factor in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yen-Ning Hsu; Chia-Jen Liu; Jen-Kou Lin; Wei-Shone Chen; Tzu-Chen Lin; Shung-Haur Yang; Jeng-Kai Jiang; Shih-Ching Chang; Yuan-Tzu Lan; Chun-Chi Lin; Chueh-Chuan Yen; Jin-Huang Liu; Cheng-Hwai Tzeng; Hao-Wei Teng
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 7.  A review of factors predicting perioperative death and early outcome in hepatopancreaticobiliary cancer surgery.

Authors:  Chris D Mann; Tom Palser; Chris D Briggs; Iain Cameron; Myrrdin Rees; John Buckles; David P Berry
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.647

8.  A multicentre controlled study of the InLine radiofrequency ablation device for liver transection.

Authors:  Peng Yao; Frank Chu; Steve Daniel; Aravin Gunasegaram; Tristan Yan; Werner Lindemann; Georg Pistorius; Martin Schilling; Junji Machi; Randall Zuckerman; David L Morris
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.647

9.  Prognostic factors and time-related changes influence results of colorectal liver metastases surgical treatment: a single-center analysis.

Authors:  Josep Martí; María Marta Modolo; Josep Fuster; Jaume Comas; Rebeca Cosa; Joana Ferrer; Victor Molina; Juan Romero; Constantino Fondevila; Ramón Charco; Juan Carlos García-Valdecasas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Prophylactic respiratory management after liver resection with bilevel positive airway pressure ventilation: Report of three cases.

Authors:  Masato Narita; Etsuro Hatano; Hiromitsu Nagata; Atsuko Yanagida; Hiroyuki Asechi; Ken-Ichi Takahashi; Iwao Ikai; Shinji Uemoto; Kazuo Chin
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2009-02-07       Impact factor: 2.549

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.