Literature DB >> 17085145

Factors contributing to a successful outcome of combined abdominal transpubic perineal urethroplasty for complex posterior urethral disruptions.

Akshay Pratap1, Chandra Shekhar Agrawal, Rakesh Kumar Pandit, Ganga Sapkota, Nitish Anchal.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We present our results of and operative principles essential for a successful outcome of complex posterior urethral disruption management.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 25 patients underwent abdominal transpubic perineal urethroplasty for complex posterior urethral disruption. Preoperative voiding cystourethrogram with retrograde urethrogram and cystourethroscopy were done to evaluate the stricture and bladder neck. Followup consisted of symptomatic and radiological assessment.
RESULTS: Patient age was 22 to 57 years. Average followup was 24 months (range 11 to 39). Four patients had previously undergone failed perineal urethroplasty. A rectourethral fistula was present in 8 patients, of whom 2 required colonic diversion, while there were false passages in 3, a periurethral cavity with abscess in 6 and bladder neck laceration in 20. Mean stricture length +/- SD was 6.5 +/- 2.5 cm (range 4 to 9). Four of the 25 patients had previously undergone failed perineal urethroplasty. The mean period between original trauma/failed repair and definitive repair was 11.5 +/- 4.4 months. Urethroplasty could be achieved through the normal subpubic route in 19 patients, while 6 required supracrural rerouting. A total of 20 patients underwent simultaneous bladder neck repair. In 24 of 25 patients (96%) postoperative cystourethrography showed a wide, patent anastomosis. Postoperatively incontinence developed in 1 of 25 patients (4%). Ten of the 25 patients (40%) were impotent after the primary injury. Potency status in our patients did not change after urethroplasty. The overall urethroplasty success rate was 92%.
CONCLUSIONS: Hostile conditions in the perineum of patients with complex posterior urethral disruption mitigate against a good result. However, the safety and success of combined abdominal transpubic perineal urethroplasty make it the procedure of choice for these difficult strictures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17085145     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  5 in total

1.  Outcome of patients with failed pelvic fracture-associated urethral injury repair: A single centre 10-year experience.

Authors:  Gaurav Garg; Manmeet Singh; Manoj Kumar; Ajay Aggarwal; Siddharth Pandey; Deepanshu Sharma; Satya Narayan Sankhwar
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2018-11-21

Review 2.  The mechanism of continence after posterior urethroplasty.

Authors:  Herman S Bagga; Kenneth W Angermeier
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2015-02-07

3.  Clinical factors that predict successful posterior urethral anastomosis with a gracilis muscle flap.

Authors:  Jin Ho Hwang; Moon Hyung Kang; Young Tae Lee; Dong Soo Park; Seung Ryeol Lee
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2013-10-15

4.  Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Delayed Anastomotic Urethroplasty for Male Pelvic Fracture Urethral Injury at a Japanese Referral Center.

Authors:  Akio Horiguchi; Masayuki Shinchi; Kenichiro Ojima; Yusuke Hirano; Keiichi Ito; Ryuichi Azuma
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Simplification of classification and surgical expertise in the delayed treatment of traumatic posterior urethral injuries.

Authors:  Enzo Palminteri; Ferdinando Fusco
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2011-08-02
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.